SUNITA BHAGIRATH MHASE AND OTHERS v. VITTHAL S/O BAHINAJI WIGHAVE AND ANOTHER
REVN/201/2021 · 2026-09-21
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10684 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10684 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
201.21revn (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
25 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 201 OF 2021 SUNITA BHAGIRATH MHASE AND OTHERS VERSUS VITTHAL S/O BAHINAJI WIGHAVE AND ANOTHER ….. Mr S. S. Munot, Advocate h/f Mr A. D. Ostwal, Advocate for Applicants Mr S. N. Deshmukh, Advocate for Respondent No.1 Mr A.A.A. Khan, APP for Respondent No.2/State …..
CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.
DATE : 21st SEPTEMBER, 2026 P. C. :
1. Mr Munot, learned Advocate holding for Advocate Mr Ostwal for the applicants submits that, since the prosecution has filed an ‘A’ Summery report before the learned Trial Court, the cause of action in the instant matter does not survive and the revision application has become infructuous. He, therefore submits that this matter can be disposed of.
2. In view of above, this criminal revision application is
disposed of as infructuous.
3. Needless to state that interim relief granted by this Court in this matter, stands vacated.
[SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.] sjk 2026:BHC-AUG:42953