2026:HHC:20104 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 7688 of 2026 Decided on : 27.05.2026 Smt. Abhilasha Kumari …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Bhim Raj Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Rahul Thakur, Deputy Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has assailed the selection of respondent No.5 as an Anganwari Worker. 2. Confronted with the query as to how the petition is maintainable, as the petitioner has not exhausted the alternative remedy available with her, learned counsel for the submits that the petitioner be allowed to withdraw this petition, 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:20104 with liberty to avail the alternative remedy. 3. The petition is permitted to be withdrawn. As far as availing of alternative remedy is concerned, this Court is not making any observation qua that because in case, the limitation for filing the appeal has elapsed, then consequences to ensue. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge May 27, 2026 (Shivank Thakur)