Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16665 RPFC No. 86 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO.86 OF 2022 BETWEEN:
SRI BASAVANAGOUDA S M S/O MAHADEVAPPA S AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS AGRICULTURIST LANDLORD R/AT HARALAHALLI VILLAGE HARIHARA TALUK DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577530
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI RUDRAPPA P, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SMT. PRIYANKA S W/O BASAVANAHOUDA S M AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS HOUSEWIFE
2.
ULLAS S.B. @ EKATNTHARAJ S B S/O BASAVANAGOUDA S M AGED ABOUT 7 YEARS REP. BY HIS MOTHER PRIYANKA S (2ND PETITIONER IS UNDER CARE AND CUSTODY OF THE NATURAL MOTHER I.E. 1ST PETITIONER)
ALL ARE R/AT NO.1675/96 BEHIND LAKSHMI VENKATESHWARA TILES
Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16665 RPFC No. 86 of 2022
MAIN ROAD, RANGANATHASWAMY LAYOUT DAVANAGERE-577005
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI S G RAJENDRA REDDY, ADVOCATE)
THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 08.03.2022 PASSED ON I.A NO.II IN C.MIS.NO.299/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, DAVANAGERE AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO
ORAL ORDER
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties.
2.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the petition is not maintainable under Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act, 1984.
3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as not maintainable with liberty to proceed in appropriate proceedings.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16665 RPFC No. 86 of 2022
4. In view of dismissal of the main petition, pending I.As. if any, do not survive for consideration and the same stands disposed of.
Sd/- (DR. K. MANMADHA RAO) JUDGE
SN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29