CWP-111 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Parmod Kumar State of Haryana and CORAM: Present: KULDEEP TIWARI 1) Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, dated 15.01.2026 (Annexure P from Ambala Sessions Division to Panchkula Sessions Division has been rejected. 2) of this Court towards the medical record of the petitioner Therefore, he submits that the child specialized that currently, Chandigarh. However, the abovesaid crucial aspect of the matter has not been brought to the notice of 11165-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Parmod Kumar Versus Haryana and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Bishan Dass Rana, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Bhupender Singh, Addl. A.G., Haryana. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (Oral) The petitioner, by instituting the Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, dated 15.01.2026 (Annexure P-6), vide which, his application for transfer from Ambala Sessions Division to Panchkula Sessions Division has been Learned counsel for the petitioner, while drawing attention of this Court towards the medical record of the petitioner, (2 years old), submits that he is suffering from epilepsy Therefore, he submits that the child needs constant treatment specialized doctors, who are available in tricity currently, the child is undergoing treatment from Chandigarh. However, the abovesaid crucial aspect of the matter has not brought to the notice of the learned Administrative Judge IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-11165-2026 Date of decision: 10.04.2026 ….Petitioner ….Respondents KULDEEP TIWARI Advocate, Mr. Bhupender Singh, Addl. A.G., Haryana. The petitioner, by instituting the present writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, lays challenge to the order 6), vide which, his application for transfer from Ambala Sessions Division to Panchkula Sessions Division has been Learned counsel for the petitioner, while drawing attention of this Court towards the medical record of the tender aged child of the , submits that he is suffering from epilepsy. needs constant treatment from the doctors, who are available in tricity only. He further submits the child is undergoing treatment from a Hospital at Chandigarh. However, the abovesaid crucial aspect of the matter has not learned Administrative Judge, which 6 writ petition under lays challenge to the order 6), vide which, his application for transfer from Ambala Sessions Division to Panchkula Sessions Division has been Learned counsel for the petitioner, while drawing attention child of the . the He further submits a Hospital at Chandigarh. However, the abovesaid crucial aspect of the matter has not which AMIT KUMAR 2026.04.16 18:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CWP-111 resulted in rejection of the application (supra), and thus, this Court is inevitable. 3. advance copy of the petition respondents No.1 and taken, in accordance with 4. cognizance of the medical condition of the this Court is of the considered view that the matter requires re consideration. 5. by way of a comprehensive representation channel, a child. In the event, any such representation is received, the authorities concerned decide the claim of the petitioner 6. 10.04.202 Ak Sharma 11165-2026 -2- resulted in rejection of the application (supra), and thus, this Court is inevitable. Mr. Siddharth Gupta, Advocate, upon being served with the advance copy of the petition, has caused appearance on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2. He submits that the impugned decision has been , in accordance with the relevant Rules. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, and taken cognizance of the medical condition of the this Court is of the considered view that the matter requires re consideration. Accordingly, the petitioner shall by way of a comprehensive representation channel, appending therewith, all the necessary medical record . In the event, any such representation is received, the authorities concerned, shall on the basis of the abovesaid aspect decide the claim of the petitioner afresh. The petitioner stands disposed of, .2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable resulted in rejection of the application (supra), and thus, indulgence of Mr. Siddharth Gupta, Advocate, upon being served with the , has caused appearance on behalf of 2. He submits that the impugned decision has been the relevant Rules. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, and taken cognizance of the medical condition of the child, as referred to above, this Court is of the considered view that the matter requires re- Accordingly, the petitioner shall again move the authorities by way of a comprehensive representation/application, through proper all the necessary medical record of the . In the event, any such representation is received, the authorities abovesaid aspects of the matter, disposed of, in the above terms. (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE Yes Yes/No indulgence of Mr. Siddharth Gupta, Advocate, upon being served with the , has caused appearance on behalf of 2. He submits that the impugned decision has been Having heard learned counsel for the parties, and taken child, as referred to above, - move the authorities , through proper of the . In the event, any such representation is received, the authorities of the matter, AMIT KUMAR 2026.04.16 18:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document