Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10678 (ALL)

MADHUBALA AND 182 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/15142/2026 · 2026-09-30

Manju Rani Chauhan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15142 of 2026 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. Heard Mr. Satyendra Chandra Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents, Mr. K. Shahi, learned counsel for the respondent no.2, Mr. Udayan Nandan, learned counsel for the respondent no.3 and Mr. Vaibhav Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondent no.4. The present petition has been filed seeking quashing of the impugned order dated 2.9.2026 and the notification/advertisement dated 3.9.2026 issued by the Uttar Pradesh Education Service Selection Commission, Prayagraj, to the extent that the same illegally and arbitrarily excludes Shiksha Mitras from applying for the Special TET examination. The issue in question has already been decided by this Court in Writ-A No. 15461 of 2026, (Vaseem Ahamad and 220 others vs. State of U.P. and 3 others ), decided on 01.10.2026. Accordingly, the present petition stands dismissed in terms of the aforesaid judgment in Vaseem Ahamad (supra). October 1, 2026 Jitendra/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Satyendra Chandra Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Kushmondeya Shahi, Vaibhav Tripathi (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Madhubala And 182 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad