Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10677 (AP)

RESU RAMANA v. MUKESH KUMAR MEENA

CC/2366/2026 · 2026-09-16

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010302102026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] THURSDAY, THE 17th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2366/2026 Between: 1. RESU RAMANA, S/O SAMBAYYA, AGE 43 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O D.NO C90, GUNADALAPETA SARIKA VILLAGE VIZIANAGARAM MANDAL VIZAYANAGARAM DISTRICT - A.P- 535004 ...PETITIONER AND 1. MUKESH KUMAR MEENA, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, LAND ACQUISITION, UNDER THE REVENUE DEPARTMENT, A.P SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522238. A.P 2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522238. A.P 3. SMT A SURYA KUMARI, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, AT VIZAYANAGARAM, A.P. VIZAYANAGARAM DISTRICT - 535003. 4. SRI P V V SURYA NARAYANA RAJU, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER AT VIZAYANAGARAM, A.P VIZAYANAGARAM DISTRICT - 535003 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to summon, prosecute and punish the respondents under sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for Willful, deliberate violation of the 2 orders of this Hon’ble High Court dated 05.01.2026 in the Writ petition No.29262/2023 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T LAKSHMI PADMAJA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 2. K M KRISHNA REDDY The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.2366 of 2026 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the order of this Court has been complied with by the respondents. Recording the said submission, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, interlocutory applications, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 17.09.2026 KBN 4 52 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Contempt Case No.2366 of 2026 17.09.2026 KKBBNN