Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10677 (ALL)

VAKIL AHMAD v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/39609/2026 · 2026-09-29

Prakash Padia, Vivek Saran

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 39609 of 2026 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J. 1. It is informed by learned Advocate holding brief of Sri Satyam Singh, learned counsel for the respodnent that his office has wrongly received the notice on behalf of D.C.B. Bank, Branch Meerut. 2. The instant petition has been filed with a prayer to quash the recovery notice by which a direction was given to the petitioner to deposit the amount till 31.07.2026. It is clear from the aforesaid notice that the same has been issued on the request made by the petitioner for foreclosure of the property. Neither the copy of the letter is appended in the present petition nor the same has been place before the Court today. 3. In such view of the matter, we are of the opinion that the present petition is bereft of necessary details and is, accordingly, dismissed. However liberty rest with the petitioner to file a fresh petition with better averments and documents. September 30, 2026 Deepika Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Javed Alam, Mohd. Azam Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Satyam Singh (Vivek Saran,J.) (Prakash Padia,J.) Vakil Ahmad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- DEEPIKA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad