1 of 2 04-Review.172.2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 4 REVIEW APPLICATION (CIVIL) NO. 172 OF 2026 IN WP/9801/2019 REVAJI KARBHARI WALUNJ VERSUS THE HONBLE MINISTER FOR REVENUE AND FOREST DEP. AND ORS. ... Mr. Vasant Digambarrao Salunke, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. B. A. Shinde, AGP for Respondent-State. Mr. S. R. Andhale, Advocate for Respondent Nos.5 and 6 in WP. ... CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 11th SEPTEMBER, 2026 P.C.:- 1. By this application, the Applicant is seeking review of the order passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.9801 of 2019 dated 11.06.2026. 2. Mr. Salunke, learned Advocate for the Applicant/Appellant contended that before this Court, in the writ petition, the order passed by the Hon’ble Minister was assailed, whereby the delay was condoned. However, according to him, this Court, without considering the limited issue involved in the writ petition, decided the matter on all the issues. He submits that the observations made by this Court regarding the availability of a remedy of approaching the Civil Court are also not proper. He submits that once this Court has recorded findings on merits, even the Civil Court would not be in a position to go beyond 2026:BHC-AUG:42714 2 of 2 04-Review.172.2026 the observations made by this Court. Therefore, he submits that the order passed by this Court needs to be recalled. 3. Per contra, Mr. S. R. Andhale, learned Advocate for Respondent Nos.5 and 6 in the writ petition submits that when the matter was heard on 11.06.2026, this Court had considered all the aspects of the matter and passed a detailed order. He submits that there is no apparent error warranting recall of the order passed by this Court, particularly when the matter was decided on merits. 4. Having heard the learned Advocates for the respective parties and with their able assistance, I have gone through the copy of the application seeking recall/review of the order. I find that this Court had considered the matter and passed a detailed order. I do not find any apparent error committed by this Court warranting interference with the said order. 5. Hence, no case is made out to interfere with the order dated 11.06.2026 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.9801 of 2019. 6. Hence, the present application is dismissed. (SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.) Tauseef