2026:HHC:8692 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 1050 of 2026 Decided on : 24.03.2026 Rakesh Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Rahul Thakur, Deputy Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged transfer order (Annexure P-4) on the ground that the same is result of a DO Note. 2. In light of the fact that the petitioner has already completed his normal tenure at his present place of posting, this petition is disposed of with the observation that the respondents shall be at liberty to transfer the petitioner to some 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:8692 other station by following the procedure prescribed in The Himachal Pradesh Police Act, 2007, because the petitioner has no vested right to stay at his present place of posting, as he already has completed his normal tenure there. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge March 24, 2026 (Shivank Thakur)