Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10669 (ALL)

RAJJAN KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

CRLP/21449/2026 · 2026-09-29

Devendra Singh I, Rajiv Gupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21449 of 2026 Court No. - 47 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for the following relief: "A. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.3 i.e. Police Commissioner, Commissionerate, District Prayagraj to take the appropriate action in view of the first information report dated 25.1.2020 registered as Case Crime No. 65 of 2020 under section 147, 323, 504, 506, 427 I.P.C. and 3 (1) (Da) and 3(1) (Dha), SC/ST Act, Police Station-Meja, District Prayagraj as the respondent no.4 & 5 due to influence of political pressure is not taking the proper action against the accused persons i.e. respondent no. 6 to 8. B. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus calling the progress report from the concerned respondents in Case Crime No. 65 of 2020, under section 147, 323, 504, 506, 427 I.P.C. and 3(1) (Da), 3(1) (Dha) SC/ST Act Police Station- Meja, District -Prayagraj, as the concerned Police is fully in active. C. Issue any other suitable writ order or direction, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case. D. Award the cost of the petition to the petitioner." Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Adhar Ram, Santosh Kumar Singh, Shyam Chandra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Rajjan Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the first informant in the present case and though the FIR in the instant case has been registered on 25.1.2020, yet the police is not investigating the case in fair and impartial manner. 4. In view of the above, the petitioner may move an application before the Police Commissioner, Commissionerate Prayagraj, highlighting his grievance and seeking fair and impartial investigation and if such an application is moved before the Police Commissioner, Commissionerate Prayagraj, the Police Commissioner, Commissionerate Prayagraj/respondent no.3 shall ensure the fair, impartial and expeditious investigation in the present case. 5. With the aforesaid observation, the present petition stands disposed of. September 30, 2026 KU CRLP No. 21449 of 2026 2 (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Digitally signed by :- KALIM UDDIN SIDDIQUI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad