Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10666 (AP)

P MANOHAR v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/40191/2022 · 2026-09-09

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010676412022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] THURSDAY, THE 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 40191/2022 Between: 1. P MANOHAR, S/O.LATE SANJEEVA RAO, AGED ABOUT 3 7YEARS, OCC TYPIST AT DISTRICT COLLECTOR'S OFFICE AT SRIKAKULAM (PRESENT VIZIANAGARAM), R/O KRISHNAVENI NILAYAM, SIVA SAI COLONY, RANGOLU, SRIKAKULAM, ANDHRA PRADESH-532484. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (REVENUE DEPT.) VELAGAPUDI GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF LAND ADMINISTRATION, (CCLA), APIIC BUILDING, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, OF SRIKAKULAM ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, OF VIZIANAGARAM ANDHRA PRADESH ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the3rdrespondentin not regularizing the services of the petitioner from the date of joining 2 i.e.22.07.2019 but regularizing the services from the date of acquiring qualification, i.e. 01.08.2021 F.N, vide Rc.No.377/2021 A3 Dt.07.04.2022, placing reliance on G.O.Ms.No.151 dated 22.06.2004 without following the law laid down by this Hon'ble Court in WP.11321 of 2019 dated.14.08.2019 and WP.17966 of 2020 dated.16.04.2021 and not considering the representations dated 20.10.2022, 25.10.2022iS illegal, arbitrary, violation of violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under Art.14, 16, 19(g) and 21 of Constitution of India consequently Set aside G.O.Ms.No.151 dated 22.06.2004 and direct the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner from the date of joining i.e.22.07.2019and suitably amend Rc.No.377/2021 A3 Dt.07.04.2022and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the representation dated.20.10.2022, 25.10.2022 in four weeks in view of Judgments of this Hon'ble Court in WP.11321 of 2019 dated.14.08.2019 and WP.17966 of 2020 dated.16.04.2021 pending disposal of the main writ petition within two weeks and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. THANDAVA YOGESH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.40191 OF 2022 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Learned counsel endorsed the same on the bundle. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the present Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 10.09.2026 KBN 4 24 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.40191 of 2022 Date: 10.09.2026 KBN