Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10665 (ALL)

SHAH FAISHAL v. SHRI JOGENDRA KUMAR, COMMISSIONER OF POLICE

CAPL/5076/2026 · 2026-09-30

Vikas Budhwar

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 5076 of 2026 Court No. - 53 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. 2. The present contempt petition has been preferred alleging non- compliance of the order passed in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 52588 of 2014 (Razeena Bano & Another Vs. State of U.P. and 3 others) reported in (2015) (2) ADJ 2323. 3. Today instructions have been produced appending therewith an FIR lodged on 30.09.2026 being FIR No. 0127 of 2026. 4. The said fact has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the applicant. Let a copy of the instructions be served upon the learned counsel for the applicant. 5. Accordingly, the contempt application stands consigned to record. 6. Instructions have been filed today is taken on record and marked as Appendix-A. October 1, 2026 Rajesh Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Raghwendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Shah Faishal .....Applicant(s) Shri Jogendra Kumar, Commissioner Of Police .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad