Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10656 (CAL)

NAZHAT PARWEEN @ NUJHAT BANU @ NAJHAT PARWEEN @ NUJHAT PARWEEN AND ORS. v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/4383/2025 · 2026-01-27

Jay Sengupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

27/01/2026 D/L – 35 Court No.28 S. Kundu Partly Allowed C.R.M.(A) 4383 of 2025 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023. In connection with Chakulia P.S case no. 307 of 2025 dated 25/7/2025 under sections 329(3)/115(2)/117(2)/118(1)/109/351(2)/3(5) of the BNS. In the matter of: Nazhat Parween @ Nujhat Banu @ najhat Parween @ Nujhat parween & Ors. ...Petitioners. Mr. Santanu Lahiri Md. Nawaz Rahman Mr. S. Azam Md. Jowwod Ms. S. Parveen …for the petitioners. Mr. Pravas Bhattacharyya Mr. Sarthak Mondal …for the State. 1. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits as follows. The petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. This is a counterblast against the FIR that was lodged by the wife of the petitioner no. 2 for matricide committed by the other sons. Charge-sheet has been submitted. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. He refers to the three injury reports and the statements of witnesses including the local witnesses. As per one of the injury reports, the injury was grievous and the petitioner no. 2 allegedly assaulted the victim herein with a sharp object in the 2 abdomen causing incised wound on the right up quadrant of abdomen and blunt trauma. 3. Considering the above, the other materials available in the case diary and the alleged role ascribed to each of the petitioners while I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner nos. 1 and 3 namely, (Nazhat Parween @ Nujhat Banu @ Najhat Parween @ Nujhat Parween, Md. Sabir Alam), the application for anticipatory bail of the petitioner no. 2 is rejected. 4. In the event of arrest, the petitioner nos. 1 and 3 shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also be subject to further conditions that the said petitioners shall not threaten or intimidate witnesses. The said petitioners shall surrender before the learned jurisdictional Court and pray for bail within four weeks from date. 5. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is allowed-in-part. 6. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance with requisite formalities. (Jay Sengupta, J.)