Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10655 (PAT)

Awdhesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CWJC/5141/2026 · 2026-04-20

Partha Sarthy

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5141 of 2026 ====================================================== Awdhesh Kumar Son of Late Rajendra Sah, Resident of Village- Chaklokman, Gola Bazar, Ward No. 12, Police Station- Dalsingh Sarai, District- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Land Reform and Revenue Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The District Magistrate, Samastipur. 3. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Dalsingh Sarai, Samastipur. 4. The Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 5. The Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad, Dalsingh Sarai, Samastipur. 6. The Tax Inspector, Nagar Parishad Dalsing Sarai, Samastipur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhaneshwar Prasad Gupta, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vivek Prasad, G.P.-7 Ms. Roona, A.C. to G.P.-7 Mr. Sanjay Kumar, A.C. to G.P.-7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 2 20-04-2026 The petitioner has filed the instant application for the following relief(s): “That, this is an application for issuance of the appropriate writ/writs, order/orders or direction/directions to the respondent authorities to accept the Holding Tax (revenue) of financial year 2025-26 and entire previous dues with respect to the piece of land of the petitioner situated under Mauja- Chaklokman, Thana No.71, Khata No.293, Plot No.840 and 841 and also for issuing the Holding Tax (Revenue) Receipts in favour of the petitioner.” 2. Mr. Dhaneshwar Prasad Gupta, learned counsel for Patna High Court CWJC No.5141 of 2026(2) dt.20-04-2026 2/2 the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner having been redressed after filing of the application, he seeks permission to withdraw the instant application. 3. In view of the above, the application is disposed of as withdrawn. Saurabh/- (Partha Sarthy, J) U