Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10653 (PAT)

Ranjeeta Devi v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./13429/2026 · 2026-02-25

Rajesh Kumar Verma

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13429 of 2026 In CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.1169 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-91 Year-2024 Thana- SC/ST District- Samastipur ====================================================== 1. Ranjeeta Devi W/o- Mukesh Kumar Jha Resident Of Village- Sarai, Ps- Mohanpur, Dist -Samstipur 2. Amit Kumar @ Amit Kumar Jha S/o- Badri Narayan Jha Resident Of Village- Sarai, Ps- Mohanpur, Dist -Samstipur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar Bihar 2. Madhu Kumari D/o- Late Param Manjhi R/v- Mohanpur Sarai, SAhpur Patori Ps- Samastipur Dist- Samastipur ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shivjee Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Anil Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 25-02-2026 Heard Mr. Shivjee Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners/appellants and Mr. Anil Kumar, learned APP for the State. 2. The present modification application is filed for modification (extension of time) of the order dated 01.07.2025 passed in Cr. Appeal (SJ) No. 1169 of 2025. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners/appellants submits that due to inadvertently it has been recorded in paragraph no. 5 of the order dated 01.07.2025 that “the appellant no. 1 carries four criminal antecedents in which she is on bail in three cases and appellant no. 2 carries three criminal Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13429 of 2026(2) dt.25-02-2026 2/2 antecedents other than the present one in which appellant no. 2 is on bail in two cases” but in fact the petitioners/appellants have filed a supplementary affidavit stating therein that two more cases are also pending against the appellants. 4. Let it be read as “ the appellant no. 1 carries six more cases other than the present one in which appellant no. 1 is on bail in three cases and appellant no. 2 carries five more cases other than the present one in which appellant no. 2 is on bail in two cases” in place of “the appellant no. 1 carries four criminal antecedents in which she is on bail in three cases and appellant no. 2 carries three criminal antecedents other than the present one in which appellant no. 2 is on bail in two cases”. 5. Accordingly, the order dated 01.07.2025 is modified to the aforesaid extent. 6. In this view of the matter, the time granted for surrender before the learned Court below in terms of order dated 01.07.2025 in Cr. Appeal (SJ) No. 1169 of 2025 is extended by four weeks from today. 7. Cr. Misc. No. 13429 of 2026 stands disposed of. Ibrar//- (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) U T