[2026:RJ-JP:29013] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 286/2026 CNR: RJHC020561212026 | URN: CR / 463U / 2026 Saraswati Shiksha Evam Bal Vikas Samiti, (Registered Office) H.No. 389. Mishra Bhawan, Ward No. 76, Jaisinghpura Khor, Jaipur (Rajasthan) Through Sachiv Evam Adhikrit Pratinidhi, Anil Kumar Mishra Suputr Shri Gopal Lal Mishra Aged 39 Years Resident House No. 389, Mishra Bhawan, Gurjaro Ka Mohalla, Ward No. 76, Jaisinghpura Khor, Jaipur- 302036 (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. Shrimati Narbada Devi W/o Shri Narangi Nath Jogi, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of Plot Number-1-3, Sharda- Colony-Vistar, Jaisinghpura-Khor, Jaipur (Rajasthan), Present Resident Gadli Ki Doongri, Jogiyon Ki Dhani Ke Pass, Ward No. 76, Jaisinghpura Khor, Jaipur- 302036 (Rajasthan) 2. Shri Ramcharan Yogi Suputr Shri Narangi Nath Jogi, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Plot Number-1,3, Sharda- Colony-Vistar, Jaisinghpura-Khor, Jaipur (Rajasthan), Present Resident Gadli Ki Doongri, Jogiyon Ki Dhani Ke Pass, Ward No. 76, Jaisinghpura Khor, Jaipur-302036 (Rajasthan). 3. Shrimati Badam Devi W/o Late Shri Mangilal Jogi, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of Gadli Ki Doongri, Jaisinghpura Khor, Jaipur-302036 (Rajasthan). ----Respondents Connected with S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 287/2026 CNR: RJHC020561302026 | URN: CR / 464U / 2026 Saraswati Shiksha Evam Bal Vikas Samiti, (Registered Office) H.No. 389. Mishra Bhawan, Ward No. 76, Jaisinghpura Khor, Jaipur (Rajasthan) Through Sachiv Evam Adhikrit Pratinidhi, Anil Kumar Mishra Suputr Shri Gopal Lal Mishra Aged 39 Years Resident House No. 389, Mishra Bhawan, Gurjaro Ka Mohalla, Ward No. 76, Jaisinghpura Khor, Jaipur- 302036 (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner [2026:RJ-JP:29013] (2 of 10) [CR-286/2026] Versus 1. Shrimati Narbada Devi W/o Shri Narangi Nath Jogi, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of Plot Number-1-3, Sharda-Colony-Vistar, Jaisinghpura-Khor, Jaipur (Rajasthan), Present Resident Gadli Ki Doongri, Jogiyon Ki Dhani Ke Pass, Ward No. 76, Jaisinghpura Khor, Jaipur- 302036 (Rajasthan) 2. Shri Ramcharan Yogi Suputr Shri Narangi Nath Jogi, Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of Plot Number-1,3, Sharda-Colony-Vistar, Jaisinghpura-Khor, Jaipur (Rajasthan), Present Resident Gadli Ki Doongri, Jogiyon Ki Dhani Ke Pass, Ward No. 76, Jaisinghpura Khor, Jaipur-302036 (Rajasthan). 3. Shrimati Badam Devi W/o Shri Mangilal Jogi, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of Gadli Ki Doongri, Jaisinghpura Khor, Jaipur (Rajasthan, Bharat). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Lalitendra Bhardwaj For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI Order 1. Arguments Concluded On: 10.07.2026 2. Judgment Reserved On: 10.07.2026 3. Full Judgment/Operative Part Pronounced: Full Judgment 4. Pronounced On: 28.07.2026 ;g flfoy iqujkoyksdu ;kfpdk,a Øe'k% 286/2026 o 287/2026 O;ogkj çfØ;k lafgrk] 1908 dh èkkjk 115 ds varxZr çLrqr dh xà gS] ftuds ekè;e ls ;kfpdkdrkZ }kjk vij ftyk U;k;kèkh'k Øe&04] t;iqj egkuxj&f}rh; (ftls vkxs fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; dg dj lEcksfèkr fd;k tk;sxk) }kjk nhokuh okn la[;k 669@2012 ¼lh-vkÃ-,l- la[;k 674@2014½ esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 18-03-2026 dh oSèkrk ,oa vkSfpR; dks pqukSrh nh xà gSA mä vkns'k }kjk fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; us ;kfpdkdrkZ [2026:RJ-JP:29013] (3 of 10) [CR-286/2026] }kjk vkns'k XIII fu;e 10 lgifBr èkkjk 151 O;ogkj çfØ;k lafgrk rFkk vkns'k XVI fu;e 1 lgifBr èkkjk 151 O;ogkj çfØ;k lafgrk- ds vèkhu çLrqr çkFkZuk&i=ksa dks fujLr djrs gq, ;g vfHker O;ä fd;k fd ;kfpdkdrkZ dks iwoZ esa i;kZIr volj çnku fd, tk pqds gSa] okn o"kZ 2012 ls yafcr gS rFkk çLrqr çkFkZuk&i= okn ds 'kh?kz fuLrkj.k ds LFkku ij dsoy foyEc dkfjr djus dh –f"V ls çLrqr fd, x, çrhr gksrs gSaA ifj.kkeLo:i nksuksa vkosnu 500@& gtsZ lfgr fujLr dj fn, x,A ₹ pwafd mDr nksuksa iqujkoyksdu ;kfpdk,a fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds ,d gh vkns'k fnukad 18-03-2026 ls O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr dh xbZ gSa] vr% mDr nksuksa ;kfpdkvksa dze'k% 286@2026 tks fd vkns'k 13 fu;e 10 lh-ih-lh- ds izkFkZuk i= ds [kkfjt fd;s tkus rFkk 287@2026 tks fd vkns'k 16 fu;e 1 lh-ih-lh- ds izkFkZuk i= dks [kkfjt fd;s tkus ls lacaf/kr gS] dk fuLrkj.k ,d gh vkns'k ds ek/;e ls fd;k tk jgk gSA ;kfpdkdrkZ ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd us fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds mä –f"Vdks.k dks fofèk rFkk LFkkfir U;kf;d fl)karksa ds çfrdwy crkrs gq, ;g dFku fd;k fd fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk fookfnr vkns'k ikfjr djrs le; u dsoy vkns'k XIII fu;e 10 rFkk vkns'k XVI fu;e 1 O;ogkj çfØ;k lafgrk ds mís'; ,oa ifjfèk dh mis{kk dh xà gS] vfirq U;k;ky; ds ml ewy nkf;Ro dh Hkh vuns[kh dh xà gS ftlds vuqlkj çR;sd U;k;ky; dk çFke drZO; fookn ds okLrfod Lo:i ,oa lR; dh [kkst dj U;k;laxr fu.kZ; rd igq¡puk gSA ;kfpdkdrkZ ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd dk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd mä çkFkZuk i=ksa ds ekè;e ls ftu vfHkys[kksa ,oa lkf{k;ksa dks ryc djus dk fuosnu fd;k x;k Fkk] os fdlh i{kdkj ds futh nLrkost u gksdj ,sls lkoZtfud ,oa ewy vfHkys[k gSa ftudk çR;{k lacaèk fookfnr laifÙk] mlds LokfeRo] dfFkr bdjkjukes] lgdkjh lfefr ds vfHkys[kksa] uksVjh jftLVj rFkk iwoZorÊ U;kf;d dk;Zokfg;ksa ls gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa ;fn U;k;ky; mu vfHkys[kksa dks ryc djus ls badkj dj nsrk gS rks U;k;fu.kZ;u dsoy miyCèk viw.kZ lkexzh rd lhfer jg tk,xk vkSj U;k;ky; fookn ds okLrfod rF; rd igq¡pus ls oafpr jg ldrk gSA ;kfpdkdrkZ ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd }kjk ;g Hkh rdZ çLrqr fd;k x;k [2026:RJ-JP:29013] (4 of 10) [CR-286/2026] fd vfHkys[k ij miyCèk lkexzh ls ;g çFke –"V;k Li"V gS fd fookfnr laifÙk ls lacafèkr vusd ,sls rF; gSa ftudk ijh{k.k ewy vfHkys[kksa ds fcuk laHko ugÈ gSA mnkgj.kkFkZ] uksVjh vfèkoäk ds fofèkd jftLVj dh çfof"V;k¡] lgdkfjrk foHkkx ds vfHkys[k] iwoZorÊ nhokuh oknksa dh ewy i=kofy;k¡] lacafèkr ,Q-vkÃ-vkj- ,oa vuqlaèkku vfHkys[k rFkk lgdkjh lfefr ds iath;u ,oa inkfèkdkfj;ksa ls lacafèkr ljdkjh fjd‚MZ] lHkh fookn ds ewy ç'uksa ls çR;{k :i ls tqM+s gq, gSaA ;kfpdkdrkZ ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd dk dguk gS fd ;fn bu vfHkys[kksa dks U;k;ky; ds le{k çLrqr djok fn;k tk, rks fookfnr ç'uksa dk fu.kZ; vfèkd çHkkoh] U;k;laxr rFkk vafre :i ls fd;k tk ldsxk vkSj vuko';d okn dh ckgqY;rkvksa ¼Multiple Litigation½ dh laHkkouk Hkh lekIr gks tk,xhA vr% fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk dsoy bl vkèkkj ij fd okn nh?kZdky ls yafcr gS] ,sls vko';d vfHkys[kksa dks ryc djus ls badkj djuk U;kf;d foosd dk mfpr ç;ksx ugÈ ekuk tk ldrkA eSaus rdks± ij xaHkhjrkiwoZd fopkj fd;k rFkk fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds vkns'k] mlds vkèkkjHkwr dkj.kksa ,oa lEiw.kZ vfHkys[k dk lkoèkkuhiwoZd voyksdu fd;k gSA ;kfpdkdrkZ }kjk çLrqr pqukSrh eq[;r% fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk vius foosdkfèkdkj ds ç;ksx ij vkèkkfjr gSA ;g fuÆookn gS fd vkns'k XIII fu;e 10 rFkk vkns'k XVI fu;e 1 lh-ih-lh- ds vèkhu çnÙk 'kfä;k¡ U;k;ky; dk foosdkfèkdkj gSa rFkk çR;sd ekeys esa mudk ç;ksx okn dh ifjfLFkfr;ksa] vkosnu dh ç—fr rFkk mldh vko';drk ds ijh{k.k ds mijkar fd;k tkrk gSA vkns'k XIII fu;e 10 lh-ih-lh- o vkns'k XVI fu;e 1 lh-ih-lh-dks ;gk¡ ij m)fjr djuk U;k;ksfpr çrhr gksrk gSA "Order XIII Rule 10. Court may send for papers from its own records or from other Courts.— (1) The Court may of its own motion, and may in its discretion upon the application of any of the parties to a suit, send for, either from its own records or from any other Court, the record of any other suit or proceeding, and inspect the same. (2) Every application made under this rule shall (unless the Court otherwise directs) be supported by an affidavit showing how the record is material to the suit in which the application is made, and [2026:RJ-JP:29013] (5 of 10) [CR-286/2026] that the applicant cannot without unreasonable delay or expense obtain a duly authenticated copy of the record or of such portion thereof as the applicant requires, or that the production of the original is necessary for the purposes of justice. (3) Nothing contained in this rule shall be deemed to enable the Court to use in evidence any document which under the law of evidence would be inadmissible in the suit". "Order XVI Rule 1 [1. List of witnesses and summons to witnesses.— (1) On or before such date as the Court may appoint, and not later than fifteen days after the date on which the issues are settled, the parties shall present in Court a list of witnesses whom they propose to call either to give evidence or to produce documents and obtain summonses to such persons for their attendance in Court. (2) A party desirous of obtaining any summons for the attendance of any person shall file in Court an application stating therein the purpose for which the witness is proposed to be summoned. (3) The Court may, for reasons to be recorded, permit a party to call, whether by summoning through Court or otherwise, any witness, other than those whose names appear in the list referred to in sub- rule (1), if such party shows sufficient cause for the omission to mention the name of such witness in the said list. (4) Subject to the provisions of sub-rule (2), summonses referred to in this rule may be obtained by the parties on an application to the Court or to such officer as may be appointed by the 1[Court in this behalf within five days of presenting the list of witnesses under sub- rule (1).]" dksà Hkh i{kdkj ek= vkosnu çLrqr dj nsus ls fdlh vfHkys[k vFkok lk{kh dks ryc djkus dk vfèkdkj vÆtr ugÈ dj ysrkA U;k;ky; dk ;g nkf;Ro vo'; gS fd og vko';d ,oa çklafxd vfHkys[kksa dks ryc djus ij fopkj djs] ijarq ;g Hkh mruk gh vko';d gS fd og ;g lqfuf'pr djs fd ,slh çfØ;k dk mi;ksx okn ds vuko';d foyac dk dkj.k u cusA fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds vkyksP; vkns'k dk voyksdu djus ls Li"V gS fd mlus vkosnu dks dsoy ,d rduhdh vkèkkj ij vLohdkj ugÈ fd;k gSA U;k;ky; us okn ds nh?kZdky ls yafcr gksus] oknh dks iwoZ esa i;kZIr volj çnku fd, tkus] oknh }kjk Lo;a dk lk{; le;c) :i ls çLrqr u fd, tkus rFkk vkosnu esa vfHkys[kksa ,oa lkf{k;ksa dh okLrfod vko';drk dk larks"ktud vkèkkj u n'kkZ, tkus tSls leLr rF;ksa ij fopkj djus ds mijkar viuk fu"d"kZ vfHkfyf[kr fd;k gSA fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; us ;g Hkh mYys[k fd;k gS fd oknh le;&le; ij fofHkUu vkosnu çLrqr djrk jgk gS] ftlls okn dh dk;Zokgh visf{kr xfr ls vkxs ugÈ c<+ ldhA ,slh [2026:RJ-JP:29013] (6 of 10) [CR-286/2026] ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ;g er O;ä djuk fd çLrqr vkosnu okn dh çxfr esa vuko';d foyac mRiUu djsaxs] çFke –"V;k euekuk vFkok nqHkkZoukiw.kZ ugÈ dgk tk ldrkA ;kfpdkdrkZ ds fo}ku vfèkoäk }kjk ;g rdZ vo'; çLrqr fd;k x;k gS fd ftu vfHkys[kksa dks ryc djus dk fuosnu fd;k x;k gS] os fookn ds U;k;iw.kZ fu.kZ; ds fy, vko';d gSa] Çdrq bl U;k;ky; dh –f"V esa ek= ,slk dFku dj nsuk i;kZIr ugÈ gSA bl lEcUèk esa bl U;k;y; dh led{k ihB ds }kjk ikfjr fofu'p; "Jai Singh Vs Jagdish & Anr" 2002 (1) WLN 514 vkns'k fnukafdr 21-05-2001 ds iSjk Øekad 8 esa fuEu vfHker O;ä fd;k x;k gSA "8. The word 'shall' has been used in a manner in Sub-rule (2) of Rule 10 of Order 13, which shows the intention of legislature that for summoning of record of court, an affidavit is required from the party that too 'unless the court otherwise directs' to show how the record is material to the suit in which the application is made. Obvious reason is that before summoning of record from a court of law the court must be satisfied that it has material bearing in the suit, which is being tried by the court then and then only the court can summon the record or document from the proceedings of the other court". vkns'k XIII fu;e 10 lh-ih-lh- dk mís'; çR;sd ml vfHkys[k dks U;k;ky; esa eaxkuk ugÈ gS ftldk mYys[k dksà i{kdkj vius vkosnu esa dj ns] cfYd U;k;ky; dks ;g larks"k gksuk vko';d gS fd lacafèkr vfHkys[k ds vHkko esa fookn dk çHkkoh fu.kZ; laHko ugÈ gSA bl lEcUèk esa ekuuh; bykgkckn mPp U;k;ky; ds }kjk ikfjr fofu'p; "Ahmad And Anr. Vs Prescribed Authority/A.J.S.C.C.-I, Kanpur Nagar & 3 Ors" WRIT-A No.-8134 of 2019 vkns'k fnukafdr 21-05-2019 ds iSjk Øekad 17 esa flfoy çfØ;k lafgrk ds varxZr vkns'k 13 fu;e 10 ds çkFkZuk ik= dks Lohdkj djrs le; U;k;ky; dks fdu ckrks dks eè;ut+j j[kuk gksxk bldk mYys[k fd;k x;k gSA mä fofu'p; ds lqlaxr Hkkx dks ;gka ij m)`r djuk U;k;ksfpr çrhr gksrk gSA 17. In view of the foregoing discussion the legal position which emerges with regard to summoning of records under Order XIII Rule 10 C.P.C. may be summarized as follows : 17.1 Unless it is made to appear to the Court that the production of the original document is necessary, the applicant would be required [2026:RJ-JP:29013] (7 of 10) [CR-286/2026] to obtain and file certified copies thereof and the original may not be sent for. 17.2 The Court must be satisfied with reference to a particular document or record that production of the original is necessary or that the applicant cannot without unreasonable delay or expense obtain a duly authenticated copy of the record or such portion thereof as he requires. 17.3 The Court is not bound in every case to send for the records from the other Court and it would not normally call for such records unless it is satisfied that the same are necessary. 17.4 Before calling for the records or documents from pending proceedings in the other Courts, the Court calling for the records must bear in mind that it may hamper the progress of the proceedings before the other Court, therefore, due care must be exercised to find out whether such documents and records are absolutely necessary for deciding the case before it, and only then it may call for those documents and records. 17.5 There should be due application of mind by the Court as to the necessity of the documents and records which are required to be called for from other Courts. 17.6 In cases where the originals are not necessary, the same may not be called for, unless it is not possible for the applicant to obtain and produce authenticated copies of the same. 17.7 Every application for calling for the records of any other suit or proceedings from any other Court has to be supported by an affidavit showing: (i) how the records were material to the case in which the application was made, and (ii) that the applicant cannot without unreasonable delay or expense obtain a duly authenticated copy of the records or such portion thereof as the applicant requires or that the production of original records were necessary for the purpose of justice. 17.8 If bringing on record a document is essential for proving the case by a party, ordinarily the same should not be refused; the Court's duty being to find out the truth. However, in the said process the Court would not encourage any fishing enquiry and it would also not assist a party in procuring a document which the party should have itself filed. fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; us miyCèk rF;ksa ds vkèkkj ij ,slk larks"k çkIr u gksus dk Li"V fu"d"kZ vfHkfyf[kr fd;k gSA ,sls fu"d"kZ dks dsoy blfy, çfrLFkkfir ugÈ fd;k tk ldrk fd bl U;k;ky; dh –f"V fdlh fHkUu fu"d"kZ rd igq¡p ldrh FkhA ;g Hkh fofèk dk lqLFkkfir fl)kar gS fd èkkjk 115 O;ogkj çfØ;k lafgrk ds vèkhu iqujh{k.k {ks=kfèkdkj vR;ar lhfer gSA iqujh{k.k U;k;ky; vihyh; U;k;ky; ds leku lk{;ksa dk iquewZY;kadu vFkok rF;ksa dk iquÆuèkkZj.k ugÈ djrkA mldk gLr{ksi rHkh visf{kr gksrk gS tc vèkhuLFk U;k;ky; us vius vfèkdkj {ks= dk vfrØe.k fd;k gks] vfèkdkj {ks= dk ç;ksx djus ls badkj fd;k gks vFkok vfèkdkj [2026:RJ-JP:29013] (8 of 10) [CR-286/2026] {ks= dk ç;ksx djrs le; ,slh HkkSfrd vfu;ferrk vFkok Li"V fofèkd =qfV dh gks ftlls U;k; dh foQyrk gksus dh laHkkouk mRiUu gksA ;fn fopkj.k U;k;ky; us vius le{k miyCèk lkexzh ij fopkj dj dkj.k;qä vkns'k ikfjr fd;k gS] rks ek= bl vkèkkj ij fd dksà vU; –f"Vdks.k Hkh laHko Fkk] iqujh{k.k U;k;ky; vius foosd dks fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds foosd ds LFkku ij çfrLFkkfir ugÈ dj ldrkA bl lEcUèk esa ekuuh; fnYyh mPp U;k;ky; ds }kjk ikfjr fofu'p; "Sunil Vs The State" CRL.REV.P.514/2022 vkns'k fnukafdr 21-07-2023 ds iSjk Øekad 7 esa fuEu vfHker O;ä fd;k x;k gSA "7. The scope of revisional jurisdiction is very limited. The Courts can exercise its revisional jurisdiction only if there is patent illegality, perversity, jurisdictional error, or an error apparent on the face of the record. In revisional jurisdiction, the Courts cannot substitute its opinion with that of the Courts below. Where two views are possible and the trial court has taken one view which is a plausible view, merely because another view is possible, the High Court should not interfere, and would be in error in interfering with the findings of the trial court in its revisional jurisdiction. High Courts cannot reappraise evidence and come to a different conclusion. The revisional jurisdiction operates within narrow contours and can be exercised only in exceptional cases where the interest of public justice so requires such an interference, to rectify a gross miscarriage of justice. In absence of any manifest error of law or procedural defects, the High Courts should refrain from interfering with the order of trial court in its revisional jurisdiction. The revisional court does not function as a court of appeal and the Court cannot reappreciate evidence. Revisional jurisdiction is normally exercised only in exceptional cases where there is a glaring defect in the procedure or there is a manifest error of law and consequently there has been a flagrant miscarriage of justice. The High Court cannot interfere with findings of fact of the learned trial Court which have been arrived at after due consideration and appreciation of evidence and material on record". orZeku çdj.k esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; us vkosnu dh xzkárk ij fopkj fd;k] nksuksa i{kksa dks lquokà dk volj çnku fd;k rFkk dkj.k;qä vkns'k ikfjr fd;kA vfHkys[k ij ,slk dksà rF; ifjyf{kr ugÈ gksrk ftlls ;g dgk tk lds fd fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; us vius vfèkdkj {ks= dk vfrØe.k fd;k gS vFkok mldk ç;ksx fdlh Li"V fofèkd =qfV ;k HkkSfrd vfu;ferrk ds lkFk fd;k gSA ;kfpdkdrkZ }kjk çLrqr leLr rdZ oLrqr% fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk fudkys x, fu"d"kks± ds xq.k&nks"k dks pqukSrh nsrs gSa] tcfd èkkjk 115 lh-ih-lh- ds vèkhu iqujh{k.k {ks=kfèkdkj dk mís'; ,sls fu"d"kks± dk iquewZY;kadu djuk ugÈ gSA [2026:RJ-JP:29013] (9 of 10) [CR-286/2026] ;kfpdkdrkZ us fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k ;g Li"V ugha fd;k gS fd okafNr nLrkost@i=kofy;ka fdl izdkj ls i{kdjku ds okLrfod fooknxzLr iz'uksa ds vo/kkj.k ds fy, lqlaxr gSA lk{khx.k ftudks ;kph ryc djkuk pkgrk gS] os dSls izdj.k ds U;k;iw.kZ fofu'p; ds fy, lqlaxr gSa] blds vfrfjDr fof/kd izko/kku esa fu/kkZfjr le;kof/k esa lk{khx.k dh lwph izLrqr ugha dj ikus dk dksbZ U;k;laxr o mfpr dkj.k Hkh ;kph }kjk ugha crk;k x;k gSA ;g U;k;ky; bl rF; ls Hkh lger gS fd U;k;ky;ksa dk nkf;Ro dsoy çR;sd vkosnu ij fopkj djuk gh ugÈ] cfYd nh?kZdky ls yafcr oknksa dk le;c) fuLrkj.k lqfuf'pr djuk Hkh gSA ;fn çR;sd pj.k ij u, vfHkys[kksa ,oa u, lkf{k;ksa dks lfEefyr djus dh vuqefr nh tkrh jgs] tcfd i{kdkj dks i;kZIr volj iwoZ esa miyCèk jgs gksa] rks okn dk vafre fu.kZ; vfuf'prdky rd LFkfxr gks ldrk gSA U;k; dh voèkkj.kk dsoy iw.kZ volj çnku djus rd lhfer ugÈ gS] cfYd le;c) U;k; Hkh mldk vfHkUu vax gSA vr% fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk nksuksa çfrLièkÊ fgrksa ds eè; larqyu LFkkfir djrs gq, vkosnu vLohdkj djuk U;kf;d foosd ds foijhr ugÈ dgk tk ldrkA mijksä leLr dkj.kksa ls ;g U;k;ky; bl fu"d"kZ ij igq¡prk gS fd fookfnr vkns'k fnukad 18-03-2026 fdlh çdkj dh vfèkdkjxr =qfV] {ks=kfèkdkj lacaèkh nks"k vFkok ,slh HkkSfrd vfu;ferrk ls xzLr ugÈ gS ftlls èkkjk 115 O;ogkj çfØ;k lafgrk ds vèkhu bl U;k;ky; }kjk gLr{ksi fd;k tkuk vko';d gksA QyLo:i] flfoy iqujkoyksdu ;kfpdk,a Øe'k% 286/2026 o 287/2026 fujkèkkj ikà tkrh gS vkSj rnuqlkj fujLr dh tkrh gSA fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; dks ;g funsZ'k fn;k tkrk gS dh og okn dk fuLrkj.k fofèk ds vuqlkj ;Fkk'kh?kz djus dk ç;kl djsA ;kfpdkdrkZ }kjk bl U;k;ky; ds le{k fcuk fdlh U;k;laxr mfpr vk/kkj ds mDr nksuksa ;kfpdk,a izLrqr dh xbZa gSa] ftlls U;k;ky; dk vewY; U;kf;d le; O;FkZ gqvk gS] vr% mDr nksuksa ;kfpdkvksa dks i`Fkd&i`Fkd :i ls 5]000@& #i, ds gtsZ ij vLohdkj dj [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA vr% ;kfpdkdrkZ dks ;g vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd og ,d ekg ds [2026:RJ-JP:29013] (10 of 10) [CR-286/2026] vanj Litigation Welfare Fund esa mDr gtkZ tek djkdj jlhn izLrqr djsA (CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J KISHAN SONI/Res.