Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1065 (CHH)

LOKESH KUNJAM v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/418/2026 · 2026-01-14

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 2026:CGHC:2498 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 418 of 2026 Lokesh Kunjam S/o Gupta Ram Kunjam, Aged About 26 Years Category- St, R/o Budhamahadev, Ward No. 11, Mathpara, Kawardha (C.G.) Pin 491995 ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of Agricultural Development And Farmer Welfare And Biotechnology, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nava Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 2 - Secretary, General Administration Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nava Raipur District Raipur C.G. 3 - Director, Directorate Of Agriculture, 2nd Floor, Indrawati Bhawan, Nava Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 4 - Additional Director, Directorate Of Agriculture, 2nd Floor, Indrawati Bhawan, Nava Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 5 - Chhattisgarh Professional Examination Board (C.G. Vyapam) Through Its Controller, Vyapam Bhawan, North Block Sector 19, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur C.G. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Kumar Yadav, Advocate For State : Mr. Yashwant Singh Thakur, Additional Advocate ALFIZA BAIG Digitally signed by ALFIZA BAIG Date: 2026.01.15 19:22:14 +0530 2 / 2 General For Respondent no. 5 : Mr. Lokesh Kunjan, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Avinash Singh, Advocate S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 15/01/2026 1. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that he is not pressing this writ petition on merits and is only seeking direction to respondent no. 3 to take decision on representation submitted by him on 11.09.2025. 2. Learned counsel for respective respondents submit that in view of limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner, they are having no objection. 3. On due consideration of submission made by learned counsel for respective parties, I find it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition at this stage directing respondent no. 3 to take decision on representation submitted by petitioner, expeditiously, preferably within a period of 02 months from the date of receipt of the order. 4. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Alfiza