Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1065 (CAL)

MADHUMITA BANDYOPADHYAY v. RAJKUMAR MALIK PRADHAN RAGHUBATI GRAM PANCHAYAT

CPAN/765/2024 · 2026-01-15

Amrita Sinha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

230 15.01.2026 Ct. No.18 pg. IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE CPAN 765 of 2024 in WPA 21002 of 2023 Madhumita Bandyopadhyay Vs. Raju Malik Mr. Tanmay Chowdhury Ms. Ritoprita Ghosh Ms. Sulagna Sarkar … For the petitioner Mr. Pritam Choudhury … For the contemnor 1. Leave granted to the advocate-on-record of the petitioner to amend the name of the contemnor in the cause title of the contempt application. The correct name of the contemnor will be Raju Malik. 2. Affidavit of compliance filed in Court today is taken on record. 3. Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that on detection of unauthorized construction, all documents relating to the unauthorized construction have been forwarded by the Panchayat to the Sub-Divisional Officer, Arambagh. 4. It will be open for the petitioner to follow up the matter with the Sub-Divisional Officer. 5. The contempt application stands disposed of. 6. The receipt dated 2nd January, 2026 showing deposit of Rs.10,000/- in the Bar Association, High 2 Court Calcutta, filed in Court today be retained with the records. 7. All parties shall act on the basis of a server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. 8. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon compliance of necessary formalities. (Amrita Sinha, J.)