Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10648 (RAJ)

JORAWAR SINGH SON OF JAGANNATH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

SOSA/2052/2025 · 2026-07-27

Vinod Kumar Bharwani

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:28987] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application No.2052/2025 In S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 2731/2025 CNR: RJHC020858012025 | URN: CRLAS / 5109U / 2025 1. Jorawar Singh Son Of Jagannath, Resident Of Chowki Badodia, P.s. Suket, District Kota. (Accused Appellant Presently Confined In Central Jail, Kota) 2. Prakash Son Of Sohanlal, Resident Of Chowki Badodia, P.s. Suket, District Kota. (Accused Appellant Presently Confined In Central Jail, Kota) 3. Raju Son Of Tarachand, Resident Of Chowki Badodia, P.s. Suket, District Kota. (Accused Appellant Presently Confined In Central Jail, Kota) 4. Tarachand Son Of Kanha, Resident Of Chowki Badodia, P.s. Suket, District Kota. (Accused Appellant Presently Confined In Central Jail, Kota) 5. Balchand @ Balu Son Of Madanlal, Resident Of Chowki Badodia, P.s. Suket, District Kota. (Accused Appellant Presently Confined In Central Jail, Kota) 6. Mohan Son Of Madanlal, Resident Of Chowki Badodia, P.s. Suket, District Kota. (Accused Appellant Presently Confined In Central Jail, Kota) ----Appellants Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. Ram Ratan Gurjar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shreeram Dhakar, PP Mr. Deepak Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI Order 27/07/2026 [2026:RJ-JP:28987] (2 of 3) [SOSA-2052/2025] Instant application for suspension of sentence has been preferred on behalf of the applicant-appellants under Section 430 of B.N.S.S. alongwith the appeal, to suspend the sentence awarded by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ramganjmandi, District Kota (Raj.) vide its judgment dated 04.09.2025 in Sessions Case No.02/2016, whereby the applicant- appellants were convicted for the alleged offence(s) & sentenced to undergo maximum period of ten years simple imprisonment with fine. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant-appellants submits that the applicants remained some time in judicial custody, subsequently, enlarged on bail during trial, and, presently, they are behind the bars since 04.09.2025. They have already undergone more than one year out of their actual sentence. Counsel further submits that the alleged incident occurred in the year 2015, wherein the injured, Parashram, had sustained injuries stated to be dangerous to life. It is further submits that, subsequent to the said incident, the parties have amicably resolved their dispute and have entered into a compromise. The injured, Parashram, as well as the Bhagirath (PW-3), are present before this Hon'ble Court and have been duly identified by their respective counsel. Counsel further submits that the learned Trial Court has not appreciated the facts & circumstances of the case holistically and the hearing of the appeal will take its own time, hence, the sentence awarded to the applicant-appellants may be suspended during the pendency of the appeal. [2026:RJ-JP:28987] (3 of 3) [SOSA-2052/2025] Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the submissions made herein-above. Learned counsel for the complainant/respondent submits that he has no objection, if the suspension of sentence is allowed. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material on record. Taking into consideration the conviction, term of sentence, custody period, compromise arrived at between the parties & the submissions made at bar and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to suspend the sentence awarded to the applicant-appellants during the pendency of the appeal. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence is allowed and it is, hereby, ordered that the execution of sentence awarded to accused-applicants, namely Jorawar Singh Son Of Jagannath, Prakash Son Of Sohanlal, Raju Son Of Tarachand, Tarachand Son Of Kanha, Balchand @ Balu Son Of Madanlal & Mohan Son Of Madanlal, by the learned Trial Court shall remain suspended during pendency of the appeal, provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- together with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before this Court on 31.08.2026 and thereafter, as and when they are called upon to do so. (VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J 116/SAURABH