Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10648 (JHR)

NIMAI CHANDRA PANDEY ALIAS NIMAI PANDEY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./1816/2026 · 2026-04-21

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:11677 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1816 of 2026 ------ Nimai Chandra Pandey @ Nimai Pandey, son of Late Jaideo Pandey @ Late Jaydev Pandey, resident of Village Panduki, Tola Ajabdih, P.O. Nagnagar, P.S. Barwadda, District Dhanbad .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner : Mr. Ankit Burman, Advocate For the State : Ms. Bandana Sinha, A.P.P. ------ 02/21.04.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Dhansar P.S. Case No.186 of 2025, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 118(2), 109(1), 308(3), 351(2) and 352 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of Arms Act pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dhanbad. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that there are case and counter case between the parties. He further submits that in the FIR there are 10 named accused persons and 100 unknown. He then submits that both the sides have received the injury. He next submits that it is not clear from whose blow such injury has been received by one Uday Pratap Singh. He also submits that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.18 of the petition. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that the allegation of assault is there and injury has also been received on the body of Uday Pratap Singh. 5. Considering that there are case and counter case between the parties and the allegations are made against 10 named accused persons and 100 unknown individual and the allegations and general and omnibus in nature and the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.18 of the petition, I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and in the event of his surrender/arrest, the petitioner, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dhanbad in connection with Dhansar P.S. Case No.186 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Anit Uploaded 23.04.2026