Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10646 (JHR)

SACHIN KUMAR v. THE UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

WPC/6690/2024 · 2026-03-16

Sri Ananda Sen

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:6939 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 6690 of 2024 1. Sachin Kumar, aged about 22 years, Son of Santosh Baitha, Resident of village- Sisari, P.O.- Torelawa, P.S.- Kharaundhi, District-Garhwa, Jharkhand-822112. 2. Sumit Kumar, aged about 20 years, Son of Moti Sah, Resident of Ward No. 08, Village-Ramna, P.O. & P.S.- Ramna, District- Garhwa, Jharkhand-822128 .... Petitioner(s). Versus 1. The Union of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, through its Principal Secretary, North Block, P.O. & P.S.- New Delhi, New Delhi. 2. Staff Selection Commission, through the Chairman, S.S.C., Block No. 12, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, P.O. & P.S.- New Delhi, New Delhi-3. 3. Director General, C.R.P.F., Block No. 02, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, P.O. & P.S.- New Delhi, New Delhi-3. 4. Regional Director, (ER), Staff Selection Commission, 1st MSO Building (8th Floor), 234/4, Acharya Jagdish Chandra Bose Road, P.O. & P.S.- Kolkata, Kolkata, West Bengal. 5. The Deputy Inspector General (Recruitment), C.R.P.F., Central Office, Block No.-01, Lodhi Road, P.O. & P.S. New Delhi, New Delhi-110003. 6. 21C/Presiding Officer, PST/PET Board CT (GD) RECTT-2024, TC&S. B.S.F., Hazaribagh, Training Centre and School, B.S.F., Hazaribagh, P.O.-PS- Muffasil B.S.F. Camp Meru, District- Hazaribagh, Jharkhand-825317. 7. Commandant/Chairman, CT/GD-2024, PST/PET Board, RECTT, CENTRE, B.S.L., C.I.S.F. Unit B.S.L. Bokaro, P.O.- Sector-02, P.S.- Bokaro Steel City, District-Bokaro, Jharkhand-827001. … Respondent(s). …… CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate For the Union of India : Mr. Pawan Kumar Pathak, C.G.C. …...... 14/ 16.03.2026: Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that petitioner No.1 has already been appointed as a constable in view of the advertisement of 2025, hence he wants to withdraw this writ petition. 2. Considering the submission, prayer is allowed. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn so far as petitioner No.1 is concerned. 4. So far as remaining petitioner i.e. petitioner No.2 is concerned, this Court has already dismissed the writ petition vide order dated 17.12.2025. 5. Thus, this entire writ petition stands disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 16th March, 2026 Satyendra/Madhav/-