1 2026:CGHC:328 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 10294 of 2025 Rupesh Behera S/o Jikar Lal Behra Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Raikera, P.S. Gharghoda, Distt. Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Applicant(s) versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Station House Officer (S.H.O.) P.S.- Gharghoda, Distt.- Raigarh (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Applicant(s) : Mr. Ashutosh Biswas, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Ankita Shukla, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 05/01/2026 1. This is the first bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 307/2025 registered at Police Station Gharghoda, Distt.- Raigarh (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 34(2) and 34(B) of C.G. Excise Act. AKHILESH KUMAR DEWANGAN Digitally signed by AKHILESH KUMAR DEWANGAN 2 2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 19.11.2025, as per secret information that present applicant is storing large quantity of foreign and country made liquor at his residence for sale, on the basis of said information, the Police of Police Station Gharghoda, raided the spot and seized 26.1 liters of liquor, which led to the registration of alleged offence against the applicant and subsequently, the applicant was arrested. Hence, the bail application. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case and 26.1 liters of liquor was not seized from the exclusive possession of the applicant. He further submits that under Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act, minimum punishment is one year and maximum punishment is three years. He also submits that the applicant has two criminal antecedents under the Excise Act, out of which, one is of the year 2020, which is pending and one is of the year 2023, which is disposed vide uncontested discharged order dated 16.12.2024, the applicant is in jail since 19.11.2025 and the conclusion of the trial is likely to take quite long time. Therefore, he prays for grant of regular bail to the applicant. 4. Learned counsel for the State/non-applicant would oppose the bail application and submit that the charge-sheet has been filed in the present case before the competent Court and the applicant has four criminal antecedents, out of which, two are of the years 2020 and 2023 under the Excise Act and two are of the years 2013 and 2016. She further submits that 26.1 liters of liquor was recovered from the 3 possession of the applicant, therefore, he is not entitled for grant of bail. 5. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the case diary. 6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, nature and gravity of allegation levelled against the applicant and the fact that though the applicant has four criminal antecedents, but considering the fact that two cases are of the years 2013 and 2016, which are old and stale, one case is disposed of, besides these cases, the applicant has only one case pending against him, which is of the year 2020 under the Excise Act, further he is in jail since 19.11.2025 and the charge-sheet has been filed, further the conclusion of the trial may take some more time, as such, this Court is of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case. 7. Accordingly, the application is allowed. 8. Let the Applicant-Rupesh Behera, involved in Crime No. 307/2025 registered at Police Station Gharghoda, Distt.- Raigarh (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 34(2) and 34(B) of C.G. Excise Act, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties in the like sum to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in 4 court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 269 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 84 of BNSS. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 209 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 of BNSS. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. 9.Office is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) CHIEF JUSTICE Akhil