Research › Search › Judgment
Bombay High Court · body
2026 DAILYLAW 10644 (BOM)
RAJESH RAMCHANDRA ADMANE v. SHARAD CHANDRAPRAKASH NEMANI AND ANR.
APPA/702/2026 · 2026-09-22
Criminal Appealbody2026
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10644 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10644 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 6appeal464.2026.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR
.
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPA) NO. 702 OF 2026 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 464 OF 2026 RAJESH RAMCHANDRA ADMANE VS SHARAD S/O CHANDRAPRAKASH NEMANI AND ANR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. T.A. Mirza, counsel for applicant/appellant. Mr. R.M. Bhangde, counsel for respondent No.1. Mr. G.S. Umale, APP for respondent/State.
CORAM : Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J.
DATED : 22-09-2026
1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the respective parties.
2. By the present application, the applicant / appellant seeks permission to correct the prayer clause and to incorporate an additional prayer clause (i-a).
3. The proposed amendment does not change the nature of claim and would not cause any prejudice to the parties. Hence, the application is allowed. The applicant / appellant shall carry out the necessary amendment within a period of two weeks’ from today.
4. By consent of both the parties, list the matter on 07/10/2026.
(Y.G. KHOBRAGADE, J.) rkn Signed by: Mr. R.K. NANDURKAR Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 23/09/2026 17:55:32