Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10643 (CHH)

MORDHWAJ SAHU v. SMT. SHANU RANJAN

MAC/346/2021 · 2026-04-19

Shri Sachin Singh Rajput

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:17806 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 346 of 2021 1 - Mordhwaj Sahu S/o- Budhram Sahu Aged About 30 Years R/o- Village - Chichirda, Police Station- Chakarbhata, Tahsil - Sakri, District - Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) (Owner Of The Offending Motorcycle No. Cg 10 Aa 9685), District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Appellant(s) versus 1 - Smt. Shanu Ranjan W/o - Ibrahim Ranjan Aged About 31 Years R/o- Through Smt. Sheetal Singh, Luthra Hospital Campus, Ganesh Chowk, Nehru Nagar Bilaspur, Tahsil And District- Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh), District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Vijay Shankar S/o Shyamlal Suryawanshi Aged About 42 Years R/o- Village - Chichirda, Police Station- Chakarbhata, Tahsil- Sakri, District- Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) (Driver Of The Offending Motorcycle No. Cg 10 Aa 9685), District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Appellant(s) : Mr. Ratnesh Kumar Agrawal, Advocate For Respondent(s) : None Hon’ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput Order on Board 20/04/2026 Challenging in the present appeal is the award dated 01.01.2020 passed in Claim Case No. 495 of 2019 by the learned 1st Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.). By the impugned award, against a claim of Rs. 20,50,000/-, the Claims Tribunal 2 has awarded a compensation of Rs. 1,67,419/- in favour of respondent No. 1 for the injuries sustained by her in a motor accident that occurred on 18.03.2018, by the rash and negligent driving of the offending motorcycle bearing registration No. CG 10 AA 9685, driven by respondent No. 2 and owned by the present appellant. 2. The present appeal has been preferred by the owner, inter alia on the ground that the Tribunal has erroneously awarded an amount of Rs. 30,000/- towards loss of income, which is not supported by any cogent evidence on record. 3. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and perused the document on record. 4. The factum of the accident and the injuries sustained by respondent No. 1 as a result thereof are not in dispute. Upon appreciation and assessment of the evidence available on record, the learned Claims Tribunal has awarded compensation under the following heads:— Medical Expenses Rs. 1,07,419/-; loss of income during treatment Rs.,30,000/-; Mental and physical agony Rs. 20,000/- and Nutritional Diet Rs.10,000/- hence total awarded compensation of Rs. 1,67,419/-. 5. In the opinion of this Court, taking into consideration the nature of injuries sustained by respondent No. 1 and the evidence available on record, there is no scope for interference with the impugned award. 6. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. 7. All pending applications, if any, shall stands disposed of. 8. The interim order stands discharged. Sd/- (Sachin Singh Rajput) JUDGE Pawan