IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Contempt Petition No.469 of 2026 Date of decision: 26.05.2026 Balraj Singh ….Petitioner Versus Nipun Jindal ….Respondent Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, J. Whether approved for reporting ?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Rahul Gathania, Advocate. Sushil Kukreja, Judge(Oral): Learned counsel for the respondent, has placed on record Office Order dated 22.05.2026, wherein, it has been stated that the representation submitted by the petitioner has been considered and rejected. 2. Therefore, in view of the above, no further order is required to be passed in the present contempt petition and accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to assail the aforesaid consideration order dated 22.05.2026, in accordance with law, if he still remains aggrieved. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge May 26, 2026 (reena) 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2