1 / 3 2026:CGHC:19351 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3618 of 2026 Heera Lal Deshmukh S/o Chherkaram Deshmukh Aged About 50 Years Teacher (L.B.) (Subject Science), Government Middle School Ruda, Block Durg, District Durg (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Directorate Of Public Instructions, First Floor, Block-C, Indrawati Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Divisional Level Rationlization Committee Through Joint Director, Durg, District Durg (C.G.) 4 - District Level Rationalization Committee Through District Education Officer And Member Secretary, Durg, District Durg (C.G.) 5 - Joint Director Education Division Durg, District Durg (C.G.) 6 - Collector Durg (C.G.) Digitally signed by PRAVEEN KUMAR SINHA Date: 2026.05.01 18:22:01 +0530 2 / 3 7 - District Education Officer Durg, District Durg (C.G.) 8 - Block Education Officer Durg, District Durg (C.G.) 9 - Headmaster Government Middle School, Ruda, Block Durg, District Durg (C.G.) 10 - Uttam Kumar Bharti Teacher (L.B.) (Subject Science), Government Middle School, Ruda, Block Durg, District Durg (C.G.) 11 - Yogita Lore Teacher (L.B.) (Subject Science), Government Middle School, Ruda, Block Durg, District Durg (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Praveen Dhurandhar, Advocate For State : Mr. Suyashdhar Badgaiya, Govt. Advocate S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 27/04/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following relief: “10.1 That, the Hon'ble Court be pleased to quash the Rationalization Transfer order dated 07-06-2025 (Annexure P-3) and also the order dated 04-07-2025 (Annexure P-8), 28-11-2025 (Annexure P-9), 14-01- 2026 (Annexure P-10). 10.2 That, the Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to direct for re-counseling and reconsider posting of the petitioner under the Rationalization Policy. 10.3 That, the Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the respondent No. 1 to take decision over the representation of the petitioner dated 19-01-2026 (Annexure P-11). 3 / 3 10.4. That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief, as it may deems fit and appropriate.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has submitted fresh representation before respondent No.1 raising all the grounds as raised in this writ petition but till date it has not been considered and decided and therefore a direction be issued to respondent No.1 to take decision on representation submitted by petitioner at the earliest within specified time frae. 3. Learned counsel fort the State submits that he is having no objection to the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. On due consideration of submission of learned counsel for respective parties, this writ petition at this stage is disposed of directing respondent No.1 to consider and take decision on the representation dated 19.01.2026 submitted by petitioner, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Praveen