Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10628 (HP)

STATE OF HP AND OTHERS v. Kumari Beena Devi

CMP.M/317/2026 · 2026-05-27

Sandeep Sharma

Review Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. v. Kumari Beena Devi CMP.M No. 317 of 2026 27.05.2026 Present: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocate General, for the applicant/state. Mr.Nishant Khidtta, Advocate, for the non- applicant/respondent. Cr.MPM No. 317 of 2026 By way of instant application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, prayer has been made by the applicant/State for condonation of delay in maintaining the accompanying review petition, which is barred by limitation. Mr. Nishant Khidtta, Advocate, has put in appearance on behalf of the non-applicant/respondent and has no objection to the afore prayer made by the applicant. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the application, this Court is convinced and satisfied that delay in maintaining the accompanying petition is neither intentional nor wilful, rather same has occurred on account of lengthy administrative process, as such, delay, which has been sufficiently explained, is condoned. The application is disposed of. Review Petition No. of 2026 Be registered. List for admission on 2.6.2026. May 27, 2026 (Sandeep Sharma), manjit Judge