JEERU SV PRASAD REDDY v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/23075/2025 · 2026-09-16
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10627 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10627 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010446622025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] THURSDAY, THE 17th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 23075/2025 Between:
1. JEERU SV PRASAD REDDY, S/O JEERU APPALA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, VICE PRESIDENT, ANDHRA KABADDI ASSOCIATION, RESIDING AT D.NO.9-6-27/1/2, SIVAJIPALEM, NEAR SIVAJI PARK, VISAKHAPATNAM
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF SPORTS AND YOUTH AFFAIRS, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 2. THE SPORTS AUTHORITY OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, IGMC STADIUM, LABBIPET, VIJAYAWADA. 3. THE ANDHRA PRADESH OLYMPIC ASSOCIATION REGN NO 569/2016, REP. BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY, 19-592/1, MASONIC CO-OP HOUSING COLONY, NEAR YOGANANDA ASHRAM, MITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE AMATEUR KABADDI FEDERATION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS ADMINISTRATOR OFFICE AT E 386, BASEMENT, CABIN-B, GREATER KAILASH, PART-I, NEW DEIHI-110048. 5. ANDHRA KABADDI ASSOCIATION, REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT SRI G.
VENKATA REDDY S/O VENKATA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
2
OFFICE AT D.
NO. 551/A, SANTHINAGAR,
GUNTAKAL, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-5158. 6. MR SRIKANTH YALAMANCHILI, R/O SAIPURAM COLONY RD., GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA
7. SMT K V PRABHAVATHI, W/O LATE M. PRAKASA RAO R/O 0PP. BOTCHA LAKSHMANA RAO HOUSE
PRADEEP NAGAR, VIZIANAGARAM
8. G VENKATA REDDY, S/O VENKATA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, PRESIDENT, ANDHRA KABADDI ASSOCIATION, OFFICE AT D. NO. 551/A, SANTHINAGAR, GUNTAKAL, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-5158 RESIDING AT 6-241, BANGARUPAPAMMA NAGAR, RAVULAPALEM, BR AMBEDHKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the entire records of the respondent no.4 in conferring recognition, vide its letter dt.21.05.2025 to respondent no.6 and 7 as office bearers of the respondent no.5, in sheer contravention of the clauses 3, 13, 19 (iii) and 21 of Bye-laws of the respondent no.5 Association, despite the fact the respondent no.5 is well represented by respondent no.8 as its President and respondent no.7 as its General Secretary vide Election declaration letter dt.
31.05.2023 and subsisting tenure for a period of 04 (four years) from the date of the election as blind fold, arbitrary to the core, illegal, colourable exercise of power, violation of principles of natural justice and violative of the fundamental Rights guaranteed under Articles 14,19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and to quash and set aside the letter dt.21.05.2025 issued by the respondent no.4 to respondent no.6 and 7 as office bearers of the respondent no.5 and it is consequentially prayed to direct the respondent no.2, 3 and 4 to extend and continue all the benefits in terms of the declaration of the election of the bearers dt.31.05.2023 i.e., continuance of the petitioner as Vice President 2 of the respondent no.5 Association and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025
3
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to dispense with the filing of the certified copy of the to call for the entire records of the respondent no.4 in conferring recognition, vide its letter dt.21.05.2025 and to pass such IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to suspend communication of the respondent no.4, conferring respondent no.6 & 7 as office bearers of the respondent no.5 vide its letter dt.21.05.2025 and enable the petitioner to continue as Vice President 2 of the respondent no.5 Association, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. G V S KISHORE KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SPORTS
2. GHANTA SRIDHAR The Court made the following:
4
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.23075 OF 2025
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Learned counsel endorsed the same on the bundle.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Accordingly, the present Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 17.09.2026
KBN
5
25 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION No.23075 of 2025 Date: 17.09.2026
KBN