Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10626 (BOM)

MINAKSHI RAMKRUSHNA BHOJNE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS

CA/10020/2026 · 2026-09-11

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 18.CA.10020.26.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10020 OF 2026 IN WP/13023/2023 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 13023 OF 2023 MINAKSHI RAMKRUSHNA BHOJNE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Biradar Ramrao Dhondiram AGP for Respondents/State : Mr. M.K. Goyanka Advocate for Respondents No.6 and 7 in WP : Mr. Kedar Warad Advocate for Respondent No.4 in WP : Mr. V.V. Bhavthankar ... CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 11.09.2026 PER COURT: The petitioner is at liberty to amend the writ petition by placing on record the document sought to be placed on record by way of this civil application. Necessary amendment be carried out within a period of two weeks and the amended copy be served on the other side. The respondents are at liberty to file their affidavit-in-reply to the amended writ petition. Civil application is disposed of. (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) habeeb/ 2026:BHC-AUG:42177-DB