RAJESH KUMAR SINGH @ PINTU SINGH v. STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./11443/2025 · 2026-01-19
Gautam Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10625 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10625 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:1412 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 11443 of 2025
------ Rajesh Kumar Singh @ Pintu Singh, S/o Chandrika Singh, R/o Village Holiding No.26, K.G. Road, Ashok Path, Bhatia Bast, Kadma, PO and PS- Kadma, Town- Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
………..
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
………..
For the Petitioner : Mr. Anurag Kashyap, Advocate
M/s Komal S. Naryan, Advocate
For the State
: Mrs. Lily Sahay, APP For the Informant : Mr. Jitesh Kumar, Advocate
------
Order No.02 / Dated : 19.01.2026.
Heard both the sides.
The petitioner, above-named, who is in custody since 12.10.2025 in connection with Sonari P.S. Case No.132 of 2025 for the offence registered under Sections 137(2), 140(2), 140(3), 308(4), 308(5), 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.
It is submitted by the learned counsel on behalf of petitioner that he is a recovery agent and loan of Rs.7,00,000/- was taken by the husband of the informant as security for Swift Desire Car. However, when the outstanding amount was not returned, the petitioner pressurized the informant to return the same, as a result of which, he has been implicated falsely in the present case for abduction of Achhat Anand (husband of the informant).
If is also submitted that the financial dispute has been amicably resolved between the parties.
Learned A.P.P. for the State assisted by learned counsel for the informant does not dispute the factual assertion made on behalf of the petitioner.
Considering the nature and gravity of offence, the above-named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/-(Twenty-Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court.
(Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sandeep/ Uploaded 20 .01.2026