Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10623 (JHR)

VIJAY MANDAL ALIAS VIJAY KUMAR MANDAL ALIAS BIJAY MANDAL ALIAS BIJAY KUMAR MANDAL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./739/2026 · 2026-02-26

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:5721] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.739 of 2026 ------ Vijay Mandal @ Vijay Kumar Mandal @ Bijay Mandal @ Bijay Kumar Mandal, aged about 21 years, son of Karu Mandal, resident of Village Siyatand, P.O. and P.S. Karmatand, District Jamtara, Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Md. Zaid Ahmed, Advocate For the State : Mr. Naveen Kr. Ganjhu, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 26-02-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection Giridih Cyber P.S. Case No.39 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 111 (2) (ii), 111 (3), 111 (4), 317 (5), 319 (2), 318 (4), 338, 336 (3), 340 (2) and 3 (5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66 (B), 66 (C) and 66 (D) of the Information Technology Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in committing cyber-crime and the verification of his mobile reveals that the same was used for purchase of gold chains, cars, etc. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-27 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is further submitted that there is no victim in this case. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 29.11.2025 as has been mentioned in para-28 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Giridih in connection with Giridih Cyber P.S. Case No.39 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated- 26.02.2026-Animesh/