Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Gujarat · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1062 (GUJ)

SADAB S/O SAJJADABHAI MIRUMIYA MALEK v. STATE OF GUJARAT

CR.MA/11813/2026 · 2026-05-19

Nirzar S Desai

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

R/CR.MA/11813/2026 ORDER DATED: 19/05/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER CHARGESHEET) NO. 11813 of 2026 ================================================================ SADAB S/O SAJJADABHAI MIRUMIYA MALEK Versus STATE OF GUJARAT ================================================================ Appearance: MR MAULIK NANAVATI FOR NANAVATI & CO.(7105) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR DHAWAN JAYSWAL, ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ================================================================ CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIRZAR S. DESAI Date : 19/05/2026 ORAL ORDER 1. RULE. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service of Rule on behalf of the respondent - State of Gujarat. 2. Heard learned advocate for the applicant and learned APP for the respondent – State. 3. By this application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the applicant is seeking release on regular bail in connection with the FIR being C.R.No.11216005260172 of 2026 registered with Dahegam Police Station, District Gandhinagar for the offences punishable under Sections 325 and 54 etc. of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and under Sections 8(2) and 8(4) of the Animal Preservation (Amendment) Act and Section 11(1)(I) of the Animal Cruelty Act. 4. Learned advocate for the applicant submitted that, the applicant is not involved in commission of offence as alleged R/CR.MA/11813/2026 ORDER DATED: 19/05/2026 in the FIR and therefore, looking to the role of the applicant and nature of the allegations, the applicant is required to be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable terms and conditions. 5. On the other hand, learned APP appearing for the respondent – State vehemently submits that, the offences, which have been charged, are serious in nature affecting the society at large and looking to the facts as well as the allegations made against the applicant, no discretion would be required to be exercised. 6. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of allegations, this Court is of the opinion that, discretion is required to be exercised to enlarge the applicant on regular bail. This Court has considered the following facts while exercising discretion in favour of the applicant :- (i) the applicant is in jail since 01.03.2026; (ii) the investigation is over and the charge-sheet is filed; (iii) no past antecedent; (iv) Co-accused namely Mahammad Parvez Jakirhusen Najirhusen Kureshi has already been enlarged on regular bail by this Court vide order dated 15.05.2026 passed in Criminal Misc. Application No. 11695 of 2026, hence, this applicant is granted bail on the ground of parity; 7. In view of the aforesaid facts, without discussing the evidence in detail, this Court, prima facie, is of the opinion that, this is a fit case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail. Hence, present application is R/CR.MA/11813/2026 ORDER DATED: 19/05/2026 allowed and the applicant is ordered to be released on regular bail in connection with the FIR being C.R.No.11216005260172 of 2026 registered with Dahegam Police Station, District Gandhinagar on executing personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall; [a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty; [b] not act in a manner injuries to the interest of the prosecution; [c] surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within a week; [d] not leave India without prior permission of the Sessions Judge concerned; [e] furnish latest address of residence to the Investigating Officer and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior permission of the trial Court; [f] mark his presence before the concerned police station in the first week of every month till the trial is over; 8. The Authorities will release the applicant only if the applicant is not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter. Bail bond to be executed before the learned Lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with law. At the trial, learned Trial Court shall not be influenced by the observations of R/CR.MA/11813/2026 ORDER DATED: 19/05/2026 preliminary nature, qua the evidence at this stage, made by this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail. 9. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted. (NIRZAR S. DESAI,J) Dolly Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: DOLLYBEN CHETANBHAI VADUKAR(HC01392), PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 19/05/2026 12:40:08