HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 41402 of 2025 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J. 1. Sri Narayan Swaroop, learned counsel for the accused-applicant hands up the supplementary affidavit explaining the criminal history. The same is taken on record. 1A. Heard Sri Swaroop, learned counsel for the accused-applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present bail application has been moved by the accused-applicant Teetu to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 178 of 2024, under Sections 331(4), 309(6), 317(2) BNS, P.S.- Bhopa, District- Muzaffar Nagar, during the pendency of trial. 3. It is contended by learned counsel for the accused-applicant that the F.I.R. has been lodged on 13.07.2024 by Iswar with the allegation that his wife Rajkali, who was all alone in the house, when anonymous persons entered the house and robbed his wife with jewellery. The accused- applicant has been arrested along with other co-accused in the police encounter case and in the disclosure statement as well as recovery of some articles, the accused-applicant has been made an accused in the present case. Further contended that except the disclosure statement of the accused, there is no other incriminating materials against him. The applicant has 16 cases criminal history, in 15 cases, he is on bail and one case is of gangster, which is invoked by the police after the present case, wherein the bail application is pending. The charge sheet is submitted. The trial is still at the nascent stage. The applicant is in jail since Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Narayan Swaroop, Vinay Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Teetu .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 18.07.2024 and hence, the applicant seeks to be released on bail. 4. Learned A.G.A. for State has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant, but could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 5. This Court has taken into consideration the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 6. Considered that merely on the basis of disclosure statement, the accused-applicant has been made an accused in the present case and there is no test identification parade carried out. 7. Hence, without touching merit of the case, the bail application is allowed. 8. The accused/applicant be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned in view of observation made by the Supreme Court in its dictums of Girish Gandhi Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [(2024) 10 SCC 674] and Policy Strategy for grant of bail in re [(2024)10SCC 685]. 9. The accused-applicant shall cooperate in judicial process for fair and speedy disposal. September 30, 2026 Shivangi BAIL No. 41402 of 2025 2 (Avnish Saxena,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHIVANGI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad