PANKAJ CHOUDHARY AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER
CRMMO/474/2026 · 2026-05-29
Sandeep Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10609 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10609 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.MMO No.474 of 2026 Date of Decision: 29.05.2026 _______________________________________________________ Pankaj Choudhary & Anr. …….Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr.
… Respondents
Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent No.1-State. Mr. Sudhir Bhatnagar, Advocate, for respondent No.2 _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral):
Learned counsel representing the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh. Ordered accordingly. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge May 29, 2026 (sunil) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?