1 910 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 338 OF 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 910 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 338 OF 2013 IN WP/3420/2012 KHEMA APPA KOLE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... None for the Petitioner Adv. S. J. Salgare, AGP for Respondents-State ... CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATED : 22/09/2026 Order (Per Vaishali Patil-Jadhav, J. ) . None for the petitioner. 2. The respondent No. 3 has filed affidavit-in-reply and it is stated in the affidavit-in-reply that the petitioner's claim for rental compensation is decided, as directed by this Court in the order under contempt. 3. In view of compliance of the order, contempt petition is disposed of. ( VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. ) ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) shivani/ 2026:BHC-AUG:43414