[2026:RJ-JP:27461] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 6th Interim Bail Application No. 11212/2026 URN: CRLMB / 20727U / 2026 Bantivardhan S/o Nipendra Verdhan, R/o House No. 326, Sector 4, Keshavpura, Police Station Mahaveer Nagar, Kota, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Kota). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rinesh Gupta For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 17/07/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this 6th interim bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.184/2021 registered at Police Station Anantpur, District Kota City for offence under Sections 452, 307, 302, 341, 384 and 34 of IPC, 1860. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in judicial custody in connection with the aforesaid offences. The petitioner has filed the present 6th application seeking interim bail on the ground that his father is undergoing treatment in connection with a kidney transplant, which is scheduled to take place on 18.07.2026. It is submitted that the presence of the petitioner is essential to look after his father's nursing care and to attend other family affairs during the period of treatment and post-operative recovery. Accordingly, the petitioner has prayed for [2026:RJ-JP:27461] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-11212/2026] the grant of interim bail for a period of 30 days. In support of the application, learned counsel has placed on record the medical reports pertaining to the petitioner's father. The said medical documents have been duly verified by the concerned SHO, who has confirmed the authenticity of the medical condition and the scheduled kidney transplant. It is further submitted that the petitioner shall surrender himself immediately after expiry of the interim bail period and shall not misuse the liberty so granted. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the application for interim bail and submitted that the petitioner is facing trial for the offence of murder and the trial is still pending. It is contended that considering the gravity and nature of the offence alleged against the petitioner, no case for grant of interim bail is made out. It is further submitted that there are other family members available to look after and take care of the petitioner's father during his treatment. Therefore, in the given circumstances, the petitioner is not entitled to the grant of interim bail. 6. Having considered the submissions advanced by the learned Public Prosecutor, the nature and gravity of the offence alleged against the petitioner and the fact that other family members are available to look after the petitioner's father and attend to his care in connection with the proposed surgery, this Court is not inclined to exercise its discretion in favour of the petitioner. 7. Hence, the present interim bail application stands dismissed. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/102