[2026:RJ-JP:28682] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3427/2026 CNR: RJHC020197922026 | URN: CRLMB / 6137U / 2026 Hukumchand S/o Shri Kanaram, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Dhani Ghasiwala Manoharpur, Tehsil Shahpura, Police Station Manoharpur, Distt. Jaipur, Presently Secretary Shri Vidhya Ashram Education And Development Society Chimanpura Shah- pura, Distt. Jaipur. (Presently Confined In Jail In Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Swadeep Singh Hora assisted by Mr. TC Sharma Mr. Arpit Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 24/07/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.317/2025 registered at Police Station Shahpura (Jaipur Rural), District Jaipur Rural for offences under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 61(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that charge- sheet has already been filed. The case is exclusively triable by the the Magistrate. Moreover, in the present matter, the complainant- Tejpal has arrived at a compromise with the petitioner-Hukum Chand on 21.07.2026. In support thereof, he has filed an affidavit [2026:RJ-JP:28682] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3427/2026] regarding the compromise. Petitioner is behind the bars since 09.02.2026 though two cases have been reported against him, however, in both cases he is already bailed out. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. Learned counsel for the complainant has acceded to the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the complainant and raises no objection if the bail application of the petitioner is allowed. 6. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made on behalf of petitioner and compromise arrived at between the parties but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 7. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Hukumchand S/o Shri Kanaram, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/4