Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10601 (JHR)

RAKHI KUMARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./11399/2025 · 2026-03-20

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:7821 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 11399 of 2025 Rakhi Kumari, aged about 28 years, D/o Pappu Saw, R/o Village-Laxman Nagar, PO & PS-Gumla, District-Gumla (Jharkhand) ... … Petitioner(s) Versus State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. K. S. Nanda Advocate For the State : Mr. Vishwanath Roy, APP -------- Order No. 04 /Dated: 20th March 2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 21(a), 21(b), 22(b), 29 of NDPS Act in connection with Gumla PS Case No. 349 of 2025. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence. It is submitted that there is allegation of alleged recovery of 19.75 gram brown sugar which is intermediary in nature however petitioner has no concerned with the alleged recovery of 19.75 gram brown sugar. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and co-accused, namely, Rohit Singh @ Rohit Kumar in B.A No. 808 of 2026 has been granted bail vide order dated 26.02.2026 by this Court. Learned counsel lastly submits that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 20.10.2025 as such, she may be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 5. Having regard to the fact that there is no criminal antecedent against the petitioner and she is lying in custody since 20.10.2025, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of 2026:JHHC:7821 2 Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Gumla in connection with Gumla PS Case No. 349 of 2025. 6. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial Court and she shall not threaten any witness and shall co-operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against the above-named petitioner, learned trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the above-named petitioner. 7. Accordingly, the instant bail application stands allowed. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 20th March 2026 Amit Uploaded on 23/03/2026