APHC010337692026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2382 OF 2026 Between: 1. JAIN IRRIGATION SYSTEMS LIMITED, Represented by its Senior Manager, Nagaraju Pradeep Kumar, H.No. 1-1-782/B/5, Opp. Park, Near Cariara Bank, Gandhinagar, Hyderabad - 500080, Telangana ...Petitioner AND 1. Shashibhushan Kumar, Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. Peeyush Kumar, Principal Secretary, Finance Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 3. B Bala Chandra Reddy, The Chief Engineer Projects and District Water Resource Officer, Water Resources Department, Telugu Ganga, Kadapa, Kadapa District. 4. U Ramesh, The Superintending Engineer, SKD GNSS Project Circle, Water Resources Department, Telugu Ganga, Kadapa, Kadapa District ...Respondents Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may 2 be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents by invoking the provisions of Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 by taking appropriate steps in accordance with law, for willful, wanton, and deliberate disobedience of the order of this Honble Court dated 19.11.2025 in W.P. No. 23355 of 2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: M SHANMUKHA TEJA Counsel for the Respondents: NAGARAJU PULLAGURA Counsel for the Respondents:SOMA RAJU YELISETTI Counsel for the Respondents:T S RAYALU 3 ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed for willful violation of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.23355 of 2025 on 19.11.2025, wherein this Court passed the following order: “7. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of and the respondents are directed to pay the admitted amount of Rs.42,46,215/- soon after release of the budget, to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four (4) months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order…” 2. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr.M. Shanmukha Teja, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the order dated 19.11.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.23355 of 2025 has been complied with by the respondents. Therefore, requested this Court to close the contempt case. 3. Recording the above submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 11.09.2026 KGR