Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10594 (RAJ)

JITENDRA KUMAR SAIN S/O SHRI BHANWAR LAL SAIN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/10653/2026 · 2026-07-15

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:26904] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10653/2026 URN: CW / 23563U / 2026 1. Jitendra Kumar Sain S/o Shri Bhanwar Lal Sain, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Darada Turki Tehsil Peeplu District Tonk, Rajasthan At Present Working Post Chaukidar, Devnarayan Boys Hostel, Pratap Nagar, Jaipur. 2. Ankit Saini S/o Shri Mohan Saini, R/o Guna, Rajaheda, District Karauli At Present Working Post Chaukidar Government Devnarayan Boys Hostel, Peepli Ka Baas Kolana, Bandikui District Dausa. 3. Pawan Kumar Saini S/o Shri Jagdish Prasad Saini, R/o Arniyan District Dausa, Rajasthan At Present Working Post Chaukidar, Government Ambedkar Hostel Dausa- ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Government Secretary, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Rajasthan Government, Jaipur. 2. Director, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Parivahan Marg, 22-Godam Ke Pass, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Nidhi Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 15/07/2026 1. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that by filing the present writ petition, the petitioners have made a limited prayer for issuance of directions to the respondents for considering their cases for granting minimum pay scale of the post of Class-IV Servant in view of the judgment passed by the Co- [2026:RJ-JP:26904] (2 of 2) [CW-10653/2026] ordinate Bench of Principal Seat at Jodhpur in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3595/2022 (Kanhaiya Lal Vs. State of Raj. and Ors.) along with connected matters and decide the representation submitted by them, as early as possible. 2. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and also perused the material made available on record. 3. In view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the present writ petition is disposed of with the directions to the respondent authorities to consider and decide the representation submitted by the petitioners as early as possible, in accordance with law 4. The stay application and pending application/s, if any, also stand/s disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ravindra/24