[2026:RJ-JP:27800] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous IInd Bail Application No. 11290/2026 URN: CRLMB / 20844U / 2026 1. Irsad S/o Mamrej, Age About 20 Years, R/o Kharak Ka Bas, Raghunathgarh, Police Station Nougaon, Distt. Alwar (Raj.) (Petitioner Is In Sub Jail Kishangarh Bas). 2. Tosif Khan S/o Arsad Ahmed, Age About 20 Years, R/o Ranika, Police Station Nagina, Distt. Nuh Mewat (Haryana) (Petitioner Is In Sub Jail Kishangarh Bas) ----Accused-Petitioners Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shazadi Bano for Mr. Ali Mohammad Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 20/07/2026 1. This instant second bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioners against the orders passed by learned trial Court dated 01.05.2026 under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No.140/2026 registered at Police Station Kishangarh Bas, District Khairthal-Tijara for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 319(2), 340(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3) & 61(2) of BNS and Section 66D of IT Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the accused-petitioners are in custody since long. He further submits that charge-sheet has already been filed; [2026:RJ-JP:27800] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-11290/2026] that no criminal antecedents are registered against the accused- petitioners; conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioners behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioners may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the contentions put forth by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioners but did not dispute with the fact that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and rival contentions advanced by the learned counsel for both the parties and particularly keeping in view the fact that accused-petitioners are behind the bars since 22.04.2026; that charge-sheet has already been filed; that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners; that trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioners on bail. 6. Therefore, this instant second bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioners Irsad S/o Mamrej and Tosif Khan S/o Arsad Ahmed are ordered to be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. [2026:RJ-JP:27800] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-11290/2026] 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve themselves in any offence(s) during currency of the bail. 8. The accused-petitioners are also directed to submit their present addresses along with mobile numbers to the concerned SHO/IO within three days of release and the concerned SHO/IO shall verify the said mobile numbers and addresses In case, the accused-petitioners change their address or mobile number, they shall submit the same before the concerned SHO/IO and also before the concerned learned Trial Court. The accused-petitioners are further directed to submit to the concerned SHO/IO, a comprehensive list of all electronic devices in their possession, including mobile phones, laptops, tablets, external hard disks and pen drive along with their IMEI numbers and serial numbers within three days of release under this bail order. 9. In case of any breach of the aforementioned condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 10. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 11. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court, Jail authorities and SHO through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J 125/SHIVANI