Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10593 (AP)

SREE BALAJI CONSTRUCTIONS v. PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS

CC/1739/2026 · 2026-09-10

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010217712026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1739/2026 Between: 1. SREE BALAJI CONSTRUCTIONS, D.NO.44/38-1-17, NEAR PANCHAMUKA ANJANEYA SWAMI TEMPLE, CHEMMUMIAPET, KADAPA, REP., BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER YELLIPALEM MADHU SUDHAN REDDY, S/O. YELLIPALEM YELLA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, RIO. D.NO.1/1728-3, PLOT NO.404, GARUDADRI RESIDENCY, YERRAMUKKAPALLE, KADAPA, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT- 522238. 2. SHREEDHARCHARUKURI I A S, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT- 518002. 3. K RAKESH CHANDRAM, KADAPA MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, KADAPA, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT- 516001. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to leased to punish the respondents herein under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for their willful, deliberate and intentional violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court, dated 22.12.2025 in W.P.No.35539 of 2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MANTHRI KIRAN KUMAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 2. P VENGALA REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.35539 of 2025, dated 22.12.2025 has been complied with and as such no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case. 2. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing would further survive for consideration in this contempt case. 3. Recording the same, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 11.09.2026 LSP 37 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1739/2026 Date: 11.09.2026 LSP