[2026:RJ-JP:27363] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9882/2026 URN: CRLMB / 18307U / 2026 Mohammad Rihaan S/o Asam, Age 21 Years, R/o Jagdaka, Police Station Nagar, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (Presently Confined At Sub Jail, Deeg). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashish Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 17/07/2026 1. This instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioner against the order dated 07.05.2026 passed by learned trial Court under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No.100/2026 registered at Police Station Nagar, District Deeg for the offence(s) under Sections 319(2), 318(2), 318(4), 111(2) (a), 111(4), 111(5), 336(3), 340(2), 338 & 61(2)(a) of BNS and Sections 66, 66C & 66D of IT Act, in which charge-sheet has been submitted under Sections 319(2), 318(2), 318(4), 111(2)(a), 111(4), 111(5), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 313 & 61(2)(a) of BNS and Sections 66, 66C, 66D & 66E of IT Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that accused-petitioner is behind the bars since long; that charge-sheet has already been filed. He further submits that there [2026:RJ-JP:27363] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-9882/2026] are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused- petitioner; that similarly situated co-accused persons have already been enlarged on bail; conclusion of trial may take considerable time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the contentions put forth by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioner but did not dispute the fact that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioner. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record; considering the facts and circumstances of the case and rival contentions advanced by the learned counsel for both the parties; particularly keeping in view the fact that the accused-petitioner is in custody 15.04.2026; that charge-sheet has already been filed; that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioner; that co-accused persons Javid and Wasim have already been enlarged on bail vide order dated 13.07.2026 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous IInd Bail Application Nos. 10398/226 and 10728/2026 respectively; that trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Mohammad Rihaan S/o Asam is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. [2026:RJ-JP:27363] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-9882/2026] 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve himself in any offence(s) during currency of the bail. 7. The accused-petitioner is also directed to submit his present address along with mobile number to the concerned SHO/IO within three days of release and the concerned SHO/IO shall verify the said mobile number and his address. In case, the accused- petitioner changes his address or mobile number, he shall submit the same before the concerned SHO/IO and also before the concerned learned Trial Court. The accused-petitioner is further directed to submit to the concerned SHO/IO, a comprehensive list of all electronic devices in his possession, including mobile phones, laptops, tablets, external hard disks and pen drive along with their IMEI numbers and serial numbers within three days of release under this bail order. 8. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 9. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. [2026:RJ-JP:27363] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-9882/2026] 10. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned SHO, trial Court and Jail authorities through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J 62/SHIVANI