Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10591 (KAR)

V JAYALAKSHMI v. A ASHWATHRAM

CRL.RP/1003/2022 · 2026-03-27

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17668 CRL.RP No. 1003 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1003 OF 2022 BETWEEN: V. JAYALAKSHMI W/O SUNDARESH, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, C/O K.S. GANESH, NO.88, 2NDMAIN, 1ST CROSS, B.C.S.LAYOUT, (NEAR BRIGHT WAY SCHOOL) UTTHARAHALLI, BENGALURU - 560 061. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.N. MAHESH CHANDRA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. MAHESH K.H, ADVOCATE) AND: A. ASHWATHRAM S/O LATE K.V. ASHWATHNARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, R/AT K.902, TOWER-6, ADARSH PLALM RETREAT, OUTER RING ROAD, D.B.HALLI, BENGALURU - 560 103. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. LOKESH C, ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO REVERSE AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCE DATED 13.06.2018 PASSED BY Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17668 CRL.RP No. 1003 of 2022 THE LEARNED MAGISTRATE XVI ADDL.C.M.M., BENGALURU IN C.C.NO.21452/2016 AND THE ORDER CONFIRMING THE SAME DATED 16.04.2022 PASSED BY THE LXII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH-63), BENGALURU IN CRL.A.NO.1235/2018 AND FURTHER BE PLEASED TO ACQUIT THE ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF N.I. ACT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER After addressing the arguments for some time, learned counsel for the revision petitioner files a memo. Sri.Lokesh C., learned counsel for the respondent appears through video conference and orally submits that he has no objection with the contents of the memo. Memo reads as under: “It is respectfully submitted that, the petitioner herein has instructed the counsel undersigned that the petitioner is willing to pay the remaining 50% of the cheque amount within 30 days, hence the memo be kindly taken on record and dispose of the present revision petition in the interest of justice and equity.” - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17668 CRL.RP No. 1003 of 2022 Placing the memo on record, revision petition stands disposed of. It is made clear that balance 50% of the fine amount if not paid within 30 days as agreed in the memo, revision petitioner shall undergo imprisonment as ordered by the learned Trial Magistrate confirmed by the First Appellate Court. Amount in deposit is ordered to be withdrawn by the complainant under due identification, if not already withdrawn. After payment of entire fine amount, fine amount of Rs.10,000/- imposed by the learned Trial Magistrate confirmed by the First Appellate Court towards defraying expenses of the State stands set aside. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE KAV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32