[2026:RJ-JP:11069] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3910/2026 Prithviraj S/o Hanuman Sahay, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Balaji Vihar, Charan Nandi, Nadi Ka Phatak, Jaipur. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohd. Umar Farooq For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 16/03/2026 1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 104/2025 registered at Police Station Khora Bisal, Jaipur West for the offence(s) under Sections 232(1), 308(2), 351(3), 111(5) BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; Petitioner is behind the bars since 22.12.2025; charge-sheet has already been filed. He further submits that co-accused Sumer Singh and Ravindra Singh vide order dated 16.02.2026 in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 1237/2026, Uttam Singh and Bhanu Pratap Singh vide order dated 16.02.2026 in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos. 16740/2025 and 16741/2025 and Mohammad Sameer and Aasif vide order dated 09.02.2026 in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application [2026:RJ-JP:11069] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3910/2026] No. 2463/2026 are already enlarged on the bail by the Co- ordinate Bench of this Court; conclusion of trial may take a long time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application and submits that there are eight criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that recovery has already been effected; petitioner is behind the bars since 22.12.2025; charge-sheet has been filed; accused-petitioner is not required for further investigation; trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Prithviraj S/o Hanuman Sahay is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not be involved in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence on 1st and 15th day of every month in the concerned police station. [2026:RJ-JP:11069] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3910/2026] 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J SHIVANI/112