SMT TANYA PATHAK AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF UP AND 5 OTHERS
WRIC/14662/2026 · 2026-04-19
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1059 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1059 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 14662 of 2026 Court No. - 76 HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J. Shri Ujjwal Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri Ashwani Kumar Tripathi, learned Chief Standing Counsel for the State are present. The instant petition has been filed by the petitioners with a prayer to issue writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents not to harass and interfere in the peaceful marital life of the petitioners. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners does not want to press this petition and wants liberty to file a fresh petition. The petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as prayed for. April 20, 2026 T. Sinha Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ujjwal Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.) Smt Tanya Pathak And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- TRIPTI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad