Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10580 (JHR)

MADHE DIGGI ALIAS MADEH DIGGI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./10606/2025 · 2026-02-17

Sri Ananda Sen

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:4558 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.10606 of 2025 ----- Madhe Diggi @ Madeh Diggi, D/o Kudu Diggi, W/o Sri Ravindra Soy, R/o Village Dengsargi, P.O. + P.S. Karaikela, District West Singhbhum, Jharkhand. … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … Opposite Party ----- CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Navneet Sahay, Advocate Mr. Madhav Prasad, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Bandana Sinha, A.P.P. ----- 03/ 17.02.2026 This Bail Application under Section 483 and 484 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, has been filed to release the petitioner on regular bail in connection with Karaikela P.S. Case No.29 of 2020, for offences under Sections 364 read with 34, 302, 201 and 120-B IPC. The case is presently pending before the Court of learned S.D.J.M. at Chaibasa. 2. Heard learned counsel representing the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State. Perused the material available on record and also gone through the impugned order. 3. Learned A.P.P. representing the State opposes the prayer for bail. 4. The allegation against the petitioner is that she was having some affair with the co-accused and it is also alleged that the deceased was also having some affairs with this petitioner. It is further alleged that after receiving a telephone call from this petitioner, the deceased left his house but thereafter did not return. 5. During investigation, a skeleton was recovered, which 2026:JHHC:4558 2 was said to be that of the deceased. The co-accused namely Pator Honhaga was arrested and he confessed that he along with others have committed the murder. On his confessional statement, name of this petitioner also transpired. Further, charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner and charge has been framed. 6. The materials against this petitioner are confessional statement of co-accused and the telephone call given by this petitioner. These materials are not sufficient to keep the petitioner in custody. Thus, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. 7. Accordingly, this Bail Application is allowed. The petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail in connection with Karaikela P.S. Case No.29 of 2020, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M. at Chaibasa, subject to the condition that one of the bailors should be a close relative of the petitioner, having sufficient landed property in his / her own name within the State of Jharkhand. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 17th February, 2026 Prashant. Cp-3 Uploaded on 19.02.2026