Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1058 (AP)

K NAVANEETH v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/7485/2026 · 2026-04-20

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010136132026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 7485/2026 Between: 1. K NAVANEETH, S/O. K. RANGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, R/O.D.NO. 40/802/2A2, 0PP. CHANDRALOCK ENCLAVE NEAR SATHYA SAIR MANDHIR NEHRU NAGAR, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT - 518001. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, THULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522237. 2. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, THULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522237. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT - 518001. 4. 4. THE KURNOOL MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT - 518001. 5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KURNOOL MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT - 518001. 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. DASARI RAMAKOTESWAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. POTHAM VENGALA REDDY SC For M.Corporation in Rayalaseema region In 2. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP 3. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri D. Ramakoteswara Rao, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, Sri M. Srinu Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Municipal Administration & Urban Development, Ms. D. Naga Chandrika, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Finance & Planning and Sri P. Vengala Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Kurnool Municipal Corporation. 2. Sri P. Vengala Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Kurnool Municipal Corporation, has submitted the Written Instructions furnished by the Commissioner, Kurnool Municipal Corporation dated 22.03.2026. Copy of it is supplied to the Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and the same is taken on record. 3. The Written Instructions would indicate that the total amount due to the Writ Petitioner is Rs.2,10,030/-. Sri P. Vengala Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Kurnool Municipal Corporation, would submit that the Writ Petitioner has made a wrong claim of Rs.3,50,000/- as EMD. Learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, on instructions, would admit that the Respondents are due to pay an amount of Rs.2,10,030/-, which is the EMD. 3 4. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court deems it appropriate to allow this Writ Petition, with a direction to all the Respondents to return the EMD amount of Rs.2,10,030/- to the Writ Petitioner and to complete the entire administrative process, both inter-departmental and intra-departmental, by way of mutual cooperation and coordination, within a period of two (2) weeks from today and transfer the due amount to the bank account of the Writ Petitioner within one (1) week thereafter. 5. Writ Petitioner is directed to submit the bank account details to the Competent Authority within one (1) week from today for effective compliance. 6. With these observations and directions, this Writ Petition stands allowed. No order as to costs. 7. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt:21.04.2026 Vns