Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10579 (PNJ)

MANPHOOL SINGH v. STATE OF HARYANA

CWP/2838/2026 · 2026-03-20

Jagmohan Bansal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

114 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.2838-2026 Date of Decision: 20.03.2026 Manphool Singh ….Petitioner vs. State of Haryana and others ….Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: Mr. R.P.Dangi, Advocate Mr. Sagar Dangi, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Akshit Pathania, AAG, Haryana Mr. Ravish Kaushik, Advocate for respondents No. 2 and 3 *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondents to release payment including security with respect to work carried out by him for the respondent along with interest @ 18% per annum. 2. Learned counsel for respondents No. 2 and 3-Haryana Tourism Corporation, on instructions from Mr. Satish Kumar, Executive Engineer, Haryana Tourism Corporation submits that admitted liability would be discharged within two months from today. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners agrees to the aforesaid arrangement. PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2026.03.20 04:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP No.2838-2026 -2- 4. In the wake of statement of both sides, the petition stands disposed of. 5. If the respondent fails to release the payments within stipulated period, it shall be liable to pay interest @ 6% per annum from the expiry of said period. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 20.03.2026 paramjit Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2026.03.20 04:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document