Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10573 (MAD)

A.SATHYAMURTHY v. The District Collector

WP/8860/2026 · 2026-03-12

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 8860 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12-03-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 8860 of 2026 1. A.Sathyamurthy Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Chengalpet District, Collectorate, G.S.T. Road Chengalpet 603 001 2.The Tahasildhar Tambaram Taluk office, G.S.T. Road, Tambaram, Chenani 600 045 Chengalpattu District 3.The Taluk surveyor Tambaram Taluk office, G.S.T. Road, Tambaram, Chenani 600 045 Chengalpattu District Respondent(s) PRAYER Directing the 2nd Respondent to upload Survey no 204/ 1B as Per Patta No 706 New Survey No 204/1B of Mambakkam Village, in the e-patta in respect of schedule mentioned property For Petitioner(s): Mr.T.D.Mohan Ram For Respondent(s): Mr. S.Arumugam, learned Government Advocate ORDER This writ petition has been filed to direct the second respondent to upload survey No.204/1B as per patta No.706 in the e-patta for the property morefully https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 8860 of 2026 described in the prayer to this writ petition based on the petitioner’s representation within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. Since the earlier representation was given by the petitioner through the legal notice, the petitioner will have to submit a fresh representation to the second respondent. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, would submit that the petitioner is willing to give a fresh representation. 3. Mr. S.Arumugam, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 4. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner’s representation as stated supra is considered on merits and in accordance with law after giving due consideration to the supporting documents filed by the petitioner and after hearing the objections of the necessary parties within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 5. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation. 6. For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the petitioner to submit a fresh representation to the second respondent, requesting the second respondent https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 8860 of 2026 to upload survey No.204/1B as per patta No.706 in the e-patta for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of the said representation from the petitioner within the stipulated time, the second respondent is directed to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law after giving due consideration to the supporting documents filed by the petitioner and after hearing the objections of the necessary parties within a period of twelve weeks thereafter. 7. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. No Costs. 12-03-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No ab To 1.The District Collector Chengalpet District, Collectorate, G.S.T. Road Chengalpet 603 001 2.The Tahasildhar Tambaram Taluk office, G.S.T. Road, Tambaram, Chenani 600 045 Chengalpattu District 3.The Taluk surveyor Tambaram Taluk office, G.S.T. Road, Tambaram, Chenani 600 045 Chengalpattu District https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 8860 of 2026 ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. ab WP No. 8860 of 2026 12-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis